Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Testing only #299

Open
codecovdesign opened this issue Oct 26, 2021 · 110 comments
Open

Testing only #299

codecovdesign opened this issue Oct 26, 2021 · 110 comments
Assignees

Comments

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor

codecovdesign commented Oct 26, 2021

Testing issue for design related to the PR comment changes.

@codecovdesign codecovdesign self-assigned this Oct 26, 2021
@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

Codecov Report

Merging #943 (482a924) into main (7acb879) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/RepoPage.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

Codecov Report

Main: 73.07% // This PR: 73.07% // Change to project: 0.00% 👍

Coverage data is based on #943 (482a924) compared to main (7acb879). Merging will not change project coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00% .

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/RepoPage.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

View full report at Codecov.

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Nov 16, 2021

Codecov Report

Base: 73.07% // Head: 74.82% // Merging will increase coverage by +1.75% 🎉

Coverage data is based on #943 (482a924) compared to main (7acb879).
The patch coverage is 100.00%, which is changed code requiring coverage.

🔍 Critical file check: 3 detected

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/RepoPage.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Nov 16, 2021

Codecov Report

Patch coverage is 78%

Base (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 74.82% increases project coverage by +1.75%

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/RepoPage.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Dec 15, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #943 (482a924) into main (7acb879) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/RepoPage.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Jan 10, 2022

Codecov upload limit reached ⚠️

This org is currently on the free Basic Plan; which includes 250 free private repo uploads each month. This month's limit has been reached and additional reports can not be generated. For unlimited uploads, upgrade to our pro plan.

💡 Tip: try our 30-day free trial for Pro Plan, which includes unlimited free uploads and unlimited users.

Do you have questions or need help? Connect with our sales team today at sales@codecov.io

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

Codecov Report

Merging #943 (482a924) into main (7acb879) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/RepoPage.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

💡 Interested in Codecov for your team? Try our 30-day free trial on Pro Plan, which includes unlimited uploads and users.

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

Codecov trial ended 🌂

This org was on a free 30-day trial of our Team Pro Plan that has now ended. Currently, the plan is on Basic Free, which includes 250 monthly uploads for up to 5 users. If you'd like to continue with the team plan, upgrade here today.

Do you have questions or need help? Connect with our sales team today at sales@codecov.io.

If you have feedback about your trial experience, please let us know in this issue.

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Aug 29, 2022

Codecov Report

Patch coverage is 78%

Base (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 74.82% increases project coverage by +1.75% 🎉

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/RepoPage.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Aug 29, 2022

Impacted file tree graph

Patch coverage is 78%

Base (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 74.82% increases project coverage by +1.75%

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/RepoPage.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Oct 24, 2022

Codecov Report

Patch has no changes to coverable lines 👍

Base (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 74.82% does not change project coverage 👍

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Oct 27, 2022

Codecov Report

Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Base (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 73.07% does not change project coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Oct 27, 2022

Codecov Report

Patch coverage is 82% of modified lines.

Base main (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 72.26% decreases project coverage by -0.81 ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

Codecov Report

Patch coverage is 100% of modified lines ✅

Base main (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 72.26% increases project coverage by +0.81 🎉

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        1        1           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Nov 2, 2022

Codecov Report

Patch coverage is 82% of modified lines.

Base main (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 72.26% decreases project coverage: -0.81 ⚠️.
Refactor comparison adjusted calculation disregarding the lines removed learn more.

Changed files Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <72.00%> (-12%)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...and 7 file with indirect coverage changes
Additional details and indirect coverage changes
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11    -1 
  Partials        1        1           
  Refactor        1        1     1     
Indirect coverage changes Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Jan 9, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage is 82% of modified lines and project coverage will decrease: -0.81 ⚠️.

Comparison is base (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 72.26%.
Refactor comparison adjusted calculation disregarding the lines removed learn more.

Files changed Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <72.00%> (-12%)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

...and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

Additional details
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11    -1 
  Partials        1        1           
  Refactor        1        1     1     

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Feb 2, 2023

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once merged to default branch, Codecov will compare the coverage reports and display results in future PR comments.

ℹ️ You can also turn on project coverage checks and project coverage reporting on pull request comment.

Thanks for integrating Codecov – We've got you covered ☂️

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Feb 2, 2023

Codecov Report

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once merged to your default branch, Codecov will compare your coverage reports and display the results in this comment.

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Feb 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 82% and project coverage change: -0.81 ⚠️.

Comparison is base (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 72.26%.
Refactor comparison adjusted calculation disregarding the lines removed learn more.

Files changed Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <72.00%> (-12%)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

...and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

Additional details
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11    -1 
  Partials        1        1           
  Refactor        1        1     1     

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Feb 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 82% and project coverage change: -0.81 ⚠️.

Comparison is base (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 72.26%.
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

3 files changed and 7 indirect changes

Additional details
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11    -1 
  Partials        1        1           
  Refactor        1        1     1     

Files changed Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <72.00%> (-12%)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

...and 7 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Feb 24, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 82% and project coverage change: -0.81 ⚠️.

Comparison is base (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 72.26%.
⚠️ Some lines detected risk factors

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11    -1 
  Partials        1        1           
  Refactor        1        1     1     

Files changed Coverage Δ Risk factors
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <72.00%> (-12%) ⚠️ modified lines with existing errors and high execution count
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) none detected 👍
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) none detected 👍

...and 7 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Have feedback on the report? Share it here

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Feb 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 98% and project coverage change: +1.01% 🎉 .

Comparison is base (7acb879) 91.46% compared to head (482a924) 92.47%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.46%   92.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11    -1 
  Partials        1        1           
  Refactor        1        1     1     

Files changed Coverage Δ
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <72.00%> (+12%)
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

...and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

Flags Coverage Δ
backend 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
frontend 100.00% <100.00%> (+1.86%)
ruby 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
Components Coverage Δ
menu-p 100.00% <100.00%> (+0.68%)
frontend 100.00% <100.00%> (+0.54%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report in Codecov by Sentry

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Apr 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 82% and project coverage change: -0.81 ⚠️.

Comparison is base (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 72.26%.
Risk factor check detected no factors 👍

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     codecov/gazebo#943   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.46%   99.47%           
=======================================
  Files         184      185    +1     
  Lines        2264     2280   +16     
  Branches      540      546    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         2252     2268   +16     
  Misses         11       11    -1 
  Partials        1        1           
  Refactor        1        1     1     

Files changed Coverage Δ Risk factors
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 100.00% <72.00%> (-12%) ⚠️ modified lines with existing errors and high execution count
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) none detected 👍
src/services/navigation/useNavLinks.js 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) none detected 👍

...and 7 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7acb879...482a924. Read the comment docs.

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Have feedback on the report? Share it here

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented May 10, 2023

Codecov Report

Files changed are non-testable or an empty upload; therefore there is no coverage data to report ✔️.

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented May 11, 2023

Codecov Report

✔️ No coverage data to report, because files changed do not require tests or are set to ignore.

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

Codecov Report

⚠️ There is an empty upload and therefore no coverage data to report; however some files changed do require tests. Run your tests and upload coverage for the report. If you wish to ignore these files, read more here.

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented May 16, 2023

Install Codecov

ℹ️ Please review and confirm the placement of the yaml input.

To learn more about PR comment data, see our documentation 📓
Group coverage reports based on type of tests or sub-projects; check out our Flags features 🏁

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented May 28, 2024

❗️ We couldn't process [3] out of [6] uploads. Codecov cannot generate a coverage report with partially processed data. Please review the upload errors on the commit page.

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented May 31, 2024

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.29%. Comparing base (193743a) to head (7d76a74).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4014       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   86.32%   70.29%   -16.04%     
===========================================
  Files         242      241        -1     
  Lines       32515    32511        -4     
  Branches     2141     1243      -898     
===========================================
- Hits        28070    22854     -5216     
- Misses       3490     8414     +4924     
- Partials      955     1243      +288     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented May 31, 2024

⚠️ Please install the Codecov App to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Note

Please install the Codecov App to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Warning

Please install the Codecov App to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

⚠️ Please install the Codecov App to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

⚠️ Please install the Codecov app badge to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

This one works:

⚠️ Please install the Codecov to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

⚠️ Please install the Codecovto ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

This has 10px top-padding:
⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.




@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Jun 17, 2024

Bundle Report

Changes will increase total bundle size by 155KB.

ℹ️ Bundle size includes cached data from a previous commit (SWE982) due to no new bundle data being uploaded.

Bundle name Size Change
main.js 1.2 MB +100 KB ⬆️
vendor.js 800 KB +50 KB ⬆️
runtime.js 45 KB +5 KB ⬆️

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests. ✅

+  Project coverage is 92.47% (+0.02%).      

Comparing base (7acb879) to head (482a924).

Additional details

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests. ✅

Project coverage is 92.47% (+0.02%). Comparing base (7acb879) to head (482a924).

Additional details

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests. ✅

Project coverage is 92.47% ⬆️ (+0.02%). Comparing base (7acb879) to head (482a924).

Additional details

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bundle Report

Changes will increase total bundle size by 155KB.

Bundle name Size Change
main.js 1.2 MB +100 KB ⬆️
vendor.js* 800 KB +50 KB ⬆️
runtime.js 45 KB +5 KB ⬆️

ℹ️ *Bundle size includes cached data from a previous commit (SWE982) due to no new bundle data being uploaded.

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

Codecov Report

Patch coverage at 75% with 3 lines missing coverage on modified lines. 🚨 Heads Up! Some changes have a history of causing bug in production. view risky changes

Files Patch % Lines Risk
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 62.00% 2 Missing ⚠️ High
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 100.00% 1 Missing ⚠️ Low

Comparison is base (7acb879) compared to head (482a924) 92.47%.

Additional details

📣 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Jul 16, 2024

🚨 Heads Up! 🚨

Looks like you've written some lines that might summon the debugging gods. Changes like these have a history of wreaking havoc in production. Here are the risky changes:

Files 🛠️ Rule 🔢 Lines ⚠️ Risk
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js Type Error Line 20-26 ⚠️ High
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js no-async-promise-executors Line 56 ⚠️ Medium

These lines have a history of causing issues in production. Double-check your code and consider adding tests to avoid potential bugs.

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Jul 16, 2024

🚨 Heads Up! 🚨

It looks like you've written some lines that are going to break things in production. Here are the problematic changes:

Files 🛠️ Rule 🔢 Lines ⚠️ Risk
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js Type Error Line 20-26 ⚠️ High
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js no-async-promise-executors Line 56 ⚠️ Medium

These changes will cause bugs in production. Double-check your code and consider adding tests to avoid potential issues.

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented Jul 17, 2024

❌ 12 Tests Failed:

Tests completed Failed Passed Skipped
5,500 12 0 0
View the top 3 failed tests by shortest run time
graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 
Stack traces | 5s run time
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: false
Received: true
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/coverage-test/coverage.test.ts:10:39)
    at Promise.then.completed (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build


graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 
Stack traces | 6s run time
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: true
Received: false
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/demo/coverage-test/coverage.test.ts:5:38)
    at Promise.then.completed (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build


graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 
Stack traces | 8s run time
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: 1
Received: -1
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/calculator/calculator.test.ts:10:31)
    at Promise.then.completed (.../jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (.../jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (.../jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (.../jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (.../jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (.../jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (.../build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (.../jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (.../jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (.../jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build

View the full list of 2 ❄️ flaky tests
graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 

Flake rate in main: 0.5% (Passed 2,950 times, failed 16 times)
Env: macos-latest, ubuntu-latest, windows-latest

Stack traces | 3s run time
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: 1
Received: -1
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/calculator/calculator.test.ts:10:31)
    at Promise.then.completed (.../jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (.../jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (.../jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (.../jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (.../jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (.../jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (.../build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (.../jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (.../jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (.../jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build


graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 

Flake rate on main: 1.25% (Passed 2,950 times, failed 38 times)
Env: windows-latest

Stack traces | 6s run time
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: 4
Received: 5
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/calculator/calculator.test.ts:5:26)
    at Promise.then.completed (.../node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (.../node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (.../node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (.../jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (.../jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (.../jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (.../jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (.../jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (.../jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (.../jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build


To view individual test run time comparison to the main branch, go to the Test Analytics dashboard.
📣 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented Jul 23, 2024

❌ 6 Unique Failures:

Tests completed Failed Passed Skipped
12 12 0 0
View the top 2 unique failures by shortest run time

[Unique failure]Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality `2 tests`

graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 
Stack traces | 6s run time
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: false
Received: true
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/coverage-test/coverage.test.ts:10:39)
    at Promise.then.completed (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build

graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 
Stack traces | 5s run time
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: false
Received: true
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/coverage-test/coverage.test.ts:10:39)
    at Promise.then.completed (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build


[Unique failure]Error: something else expect(received).toEqual(expected) `2 tests`

graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 
Stack traces | 5s run time
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: false
Received: true
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/coverage-test/coverage.test.ts:10:39)
    at Promise.then.completed (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build

graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 
Stack traces | 4s run time
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: false
Received: true
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/coverage-test/coverage.test.ts:10:39)
    at Promise.then.completed (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build

View the full list of 2 ❄️ flaky tests (can one of the test from an unique failure is being flaky?)

[Unique failure]Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality `2 tests`

graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 

Flake rate in main: 0.5% (Passed 2,950 times, failed 16 times)
Env: macos-latest, ubuntu-latest, windows-latest

graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 

Flake rate on main: 1.25% (Passed 2,950 times, failed 38 times)
Env: windows-latest


You can Rerun CI to get rid of flaky tests.

@rohan-at-sentry
Copy link

rohan-at-sentry commented Jul 23, 2024

❌ 6 Unique Failures:

Tests completed Failed Passed Skipped
12 12 0 0
View the top 2 unique failures by shortest run time

[Unique failure test]Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality `2 tests`

graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 
Stack traces | 6s run time
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: false
Received: true
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/coverage-test/coverage.test.ts:10:39)
    at Promise.then.completed (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build

graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 
Stack traces | 5s run time
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: false
Received: true
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/coverage-test/coverage.test.ts:10:39)
    at Promise.then.completed (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build


[Unique failure test]Error: something else expect(received).toEqual(expected) `2 tests`

graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 
Stack traces | 5s run time
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: false
Received: true
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/coverage-test/coverage.test.ts:10:39)
    at Promise.then.completed (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build

graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 
Stack traces | 4s run time
Error: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
Expected: false
Received: true
    at Object.&lt;anonymous&gt; (.../demo/coverage-test/coverage.test.ts:10:39)
    at Promise.then.completed (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:298:28)
    at new Promise (&lt;anonymous&gt;)
    at callAsyncCircusFn (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/utils.js:231:10)
    at _callCircusTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:316:40)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at _runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:252:3)
    at _runTestsForDescribeBlock (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:126:9)
    at run (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/run.js:71:3)
    at runAndTransformResultsToJestFormat (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapterInit.js:122:21)
    at jestAdapter (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-circus/build/legacy-code-todo-rewrite/jestAdapter.js:79:19)
    at runTestInternal (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:367:16)
    at runTest (/Users/josephsawaya/dev/test-result-action/node_modules/jest-runner/build/runTest.js:444:34)

View the CI build

View the full list of 2 ❄️ flaky tests )
graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 

Flake rate in main: 0.5% (Passed 2,950 times, failed 16 times)
Env: macos-latest, ubuntu-latest, windows-latest

graphql_api/tests/test_owner.py::TestOwnerType::test_fetch_current_user_is_not_okta_authenticated 

Flake rate on main: 1.25% (Passed 2,950 times, failed 38 times)
Env: windows-latest


You can Rerun CI to get rid of flaky tests.

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented Jul 25, 2024

❌ No result:

Test Analytics can't find your XML file. Please ensure the file name and path are correct.

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented Aug 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Image

Excellent work 🎉 ! A 7.35% increase in code coverage is a significant step forward your dedication is driving the quality to new heights!

Patch coverage is 69.23% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage.
Project coverage is 80.00%. Comparing base (b3fcd94) to head (3eba32f).

Files changed Patch % Lines
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 0.00% 4 Missing⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #943   +/-   ##
=======================================
+ Coverage   72.64%   80.00%   +7.35%     
=======================================
  Files          29       29              
  Lines        2903     2906       +3     
  Branches      178      196      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits         2109     2325     +216     
+ Misses        786      573     -213     
  Partials        8        8              

☂️ View full report in Codecov by Sentry

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov AI assistant

🌂 You have 120 uncovered lines.
To generate new tests, use the command prompt @codecov-ai-reviewer test.

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov AI tests generator

60 new tests generated for 120 uncovered lines ✅

Here are top 3 generated tests for the 120 uncovered lines in file_location.test.js for your [X logic] and [UI interactions].

  • test name
  • test name
  • test name

To use these tests, you'll need to merge them into your PR. Feel free to customize them or add more tests for the partially covered lines!

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov AI tests generator

Your coverage has increased by 20% from the new tests. ✅ 🎉

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov AI

🧠 You can trigger the Codecov AI by commenting on this PR:

  • @codecov-ai-reviewer test the bot will generate tests for this PR.
  • @codecov-ai-reviewer review the bot will review this PR and make suggestions.

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov AI assistant

🧠 Here is the 60 new tests generated for 120 uncovered lines in ./path/test.js for your [logic A] and [logic B]. To use these tests, you'll need to merge them into your PR. Feel free to customize them or add more tests for the partially covered lines!

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov AI assistant

🧠 Your coverage has increased by 20% (+120 covered lines) from the new tests. ✅ 🎉 #1658

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Aug 28, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: patch coverage is 55% with 9 lines in your changes missing or with partial coverage. Please review.

Files Patch % Lines
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 62.00% 4 missing and 1 partial ⚠️
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 45.00% 4 missing ⚠️

Project coverage is 92.47%. Comparing base (7acb879) to head (482a924).

Additional details

📣 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Aug 28, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes with partial coverage. Please review.

Files Patch % Lines
src/pages/RepoPage/example.js 62.00% 2 partial ⚠️
src/pages/RepoPage/new/New.js 45.00% 1 partial ⚠️

Project coverage is 92.47%. Comparing base (7acb879) to head (482a924).

Additional details

📣 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Sep 3, 2024

Bundle Report

Changes will increase the total bundle size by +2.25kN (3.07%). This is within the allowed configured threshold ✅.

detailed changes

@Adal3n3
Copy link

Adal3n3 commented Sep 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Base (7acb879) 73.07% compared to head (482a924) 73.07% does not change project coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

☂️ View full report at Codecov
📣 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue


🚀 Exciting News! Check out our two new features. Give them a try today!

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Sep 26, 2024

Risk Analysis Report: Detected 2 High-Priority Issues in Your Recent Changes

  1. High likelihood of error in Line 45 (my_function) – 70% chance this will cause an error in production.

    • Severity: High
    • Description: This code pattern has caused null pointer exceptions in the past.
    • Confidence: 90%
    • Related Production Errors: 3 similar errors found in Product A.
    • Suggested Fix: Add a null check to handle edge cases.
  2. Potential performance issue on Line 78 – 60% chance this will cause slow response times.

    • Severity: Medium
    • Description: Heavy database call identified.
    • Confidence: 60%
    • Suggested Fix: Consider optimizing the query or adding caching.

🔽 Static Analysis Findings (5 lower-risk issues)

Line Issue Summary Severity Suggested Next Steps
112 Missing semicolon Low Add a semicolon for consistent formatting
145 Unused variable Low Remove the unused variable to clean up code
205 Potential null pointer (low risk) Medium Add a null check to handle edge cases
275 Long function, consider refactoring Low Refactor the function to improve readability
314 Redundant check Low Remove redundant logic to optimize performance

View Full Static Analysis Report

@codecovdesign
Copy link
Contributor Author

codecovdesign commented Sep 26, 2024

Risk Analysis Report: ✅ No Critical Issues Detected, ℹ Lower-Risk Issues Found


🔽 Static Analysis Findings (5 lower-risk issues)

Line Issue Summary Severity Suggested Next Steps
112 Missing semicolon Low Add a semicolon for consistent formatting
145 Unused variable Low Remove the unused variable to clean up code
205 Potential null pointer (low risk) Medium Add a null check to handle edge cases.
275 Long function, consider refactoring Low Refactor the function to improve readability.
314 Redundant check Low Remove redundant logic to optimize performance

View Full Static Analysis Report

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants