New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explicitly specifying cwd does not work as described in the document #234
Comments
Looks like it rotted because the example wasn't taken from a unit test, shouldn't be too hard to fix it and keep it working in future |
How do you plan to make it work with features like "invoking files"?
|
Haven't quite figured it out yet; probably will change the syntax in the next major version |
This will be fixed by (the poorly named commit) c67d59a. The "final" syntax will be %(cwd/'other, args) |
Thanks for the fix! I see that you can now use |
@lastland you'd so something like %.apply(wd1/'program1, args)(wd2) It's kinda annoying you have to do the explicit You could also make |
Thanks! I see. Do you think if this usage should be tested or documented as well? I understand that |
Yeah it should be... I'll go do that now |
In the document it says you can specify current working directory like this:
What I've actually got is:
With implicit
wd
imported, it will be:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: