Skip to content

Conversation

@michelroegl-brunner
Copy link
Member

✍️ Description

Need to correct the searchpattern as the line numbers have changed.

🔗 Related PR / Discussion / Issue

✅ Prerequisites

Before this PR can be reviewed, the following must be completed:

  • [] Self-review performed – Code follows established patterns and conventions.
  • [] Testing performed – Changes have been thoroughly tested and verified.

🛠️ Type of Change

Select all that apply:

  • 🐞 Bug fix – Resolves an issue without breaking functionality.
  • [] ✨ New feature – Adds new, non-breaking functionality.
  • [] 💥 Breaking change – Alters existing functionality in a way that may require updates.
  • [] 🆕 New script – A fully functional and tested script or script set.

📋 Additional Information (optional)

@michelroegl-brunner michelroegl-brunner requested a review from a team as a code owner February 11, 2025 19:18
@michelroegl-brunner michelroegl-brunner changed the title Update Workflow file. Update Script Test Workflow file. Feb 11, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the maintenance Code maintenance or general upkeep of the project label Feb 11, 2025
@michelroegl-brunner michelroegl-brunner added invalid This doesn't seem right and removed maintenance Code maintenance or general upkeep of the project labels Feb 11, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the maintenance Code maintenance or general upkeep of the project label Feb 11, 2025
@michelroegl-brunner michelroegl-brunner removed the maintenance Code maintenance or general upkeep of the project label Feb 11, 2025
@michelroegl-brunner michelroegl-brunner merged commit ecc2949 into main Feb 11, 2025
2 checks passed
@michelroegl-brunner michelroegl-brunner deleted the michelroegl-brunner-patch-2 branch February 13, 2025 09:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

invalid This doesn't seem right

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants