Permalink
Browse files

Correction of SPDX license identifier examples

The more common LGPL version number is 2.1 not 2.0, this is a minor mistake I made and should be corrected now.
  • Loading branch information...
1 parent 7b3ce47 commit e3cbe3fb1e8228112cc1f2572e8cdb39de90c85d @ktomk ktomk committed Aug 18, 2012
Showing with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
  1. +4 −4 doc/04-schema.md
View
@@ -140,8 +140,8 @@ The recommended notation for the most common licenses is (alphabetical):
GPL-2.0+
GPL-3.0
GPL-3.0+
- LGPL-2.0
- LGPL-2.0+
+ LGPL-2.1
+ LGPL-2.1+
LGPL-3.0
LGPL-3.0+
MIT
@@ -163,15 +163,15 @@ An Example for disjunctive licenses:
{
"license": [
- "LGPL-2.0",
+ "LGPL-2.1",
"GPL-3.0+"
]
}
Alternatively they can be separated with "or" and enclosed in parenthesis;
{
- "license": "(LGPL-2.0 or GPL-3.0+)"
+ "license": "(LGPL-2.1 or GPL-3.0+)"
}
Similarly when multiple licenses need to be applied ("conjunctive license"),

0 comments on commit e3cbe3f

Please sign in to comment.