Skip to content
A talk: "Elegant memoization"
TeX Makefile
Branch: master
Clone or download
Fetching latest commit…
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.

Talk: Elegant memoization

I gave this talk at the Hacker Dojo in Mountain View, California on April 3, 2014.

You can find the slides (PDF) in my talks folder.


Functional programming languages emphasize the use of (pure) functions, but they also carry an implementation bias against them. In most functional programming languages, including Haskell, if you express a value and then access it twice, you'll pay only once. For data structures, every component has this property. For functions, however, an analogous property does not hold: if you apply a function twice to the same argument, the result will be recomputed. Donald Michie invented a solution, which he called "memoization". The trick is to store function results in a lookup table for later reuse. From this perspective, memoization is an imperative technique. Ironically, the technique is only correct for pure functions.

I'm going to talk about purely functional memoization. The idea, due to Ralf Hinze, is to use a few simple type isomorphisms to guide and justify the memoization, leading to the systematic construction of trie data structures ("digital search trees") from first principles. I'll show a Haskell implementation of the idea, adapted from code by Spencer Janssen and using associated types.

You can’t perform that action at this time.