config of package_id default mode #4644
Totally redundant, but the user will search for
I'm just commenting these things in case you haven't realized about them; naming is hard, keeping the docs updated too, linking one section of the docs with other sections is also important. I think that having the same naming for the strings that the user has to manage is better, I'm not saying anything about the naming of the variables. But let's ping @danimtb, as the guardian of the docs his opinion about naming is important too.
Although it may be redundant, I think it is better to keep the same naming as in that section. Users are not very used to this kind of use cases and I think the section is well documented, so having to explain the modes twice is not necessary.
I am not sure about the