Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.Sign up
update to Concordion 2.1.0 #15
Not yet, but I'm keen to see it. We've seen a 5-fold increase in Concordion (Java) usage with Concordion 2.0.
The current status is:
In terms of a project team to port and support the implementation:
Are you interested in joining the team @jproSea ?
Thanks for your offers of help @eugene-griaznov and @jproSea. I'll have a bit of time to start looking at what needs doing next week. The plan is to start from the concordion-net native port. Initially we'll do a delta between that level of code base and the latest Java code and investigate what needs doing. We'll also be creating some shared specs between Java and .NET.
My presentation for the user group is at http://concordion.org/presentations/2017-07-Concordion.NET/. All comments welcome please!
It's under a creative commons license, so feel to fork it and present it to other meetup groups yourselves :)
Thanks for your offers to help with Concordion.NET development.
@ShaKaRee has been involved in development of both the original code base, and the code base that was cross-compiled from Java using IKVM. He's now too busy to support it, but is open for questions and will help guide the project.
As a first step, I propose we move to a stable base for Concordion.NET. As detailed above, this would be based on the original native .NET code base, and would implement a set of specifications that are common to both the Java and .NET codebases.
I have refactored the Java code to extract the common specifications into a new repository https://github.com/concordion/concordion-specification-common, and then included these as a
I propose that we have a Slack channel to co-ordinate this, and have set up a #concordion-net channel on concordion.slack.com. Hopefully, you'll get an invitation to this - let me know if you can't join it.
Let us know if you have bandwidth and interest in implementing the steps above.
@ShaKaRee - let me know if I missed anything, or you disagree with the approach?