Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Not all annotations have type definitions on them #232

Closed
tim-evans opened this issue Oct 7, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #290
Closed

Not all annotations have type definitions on them #232

tim-evans opened this issue Oct 7, 2019 · 0 comments · Fixed by #290
Labels
🐞 Bug This is identified as a bug or is fixing a bug 🐣 Good First Issue This is a good issue for first-time contributors

Comments

@tim-evans
Copy link
Collaborator

Some annotation definitions don't have an annotation schema defined on them.

The following packages have incomplete / incorrectly defined annotation definitions on them:

  • @atjson/source-gdocs-paste
  • @atjson/source-mobiledoc
  • @atjson/source-prism
  • @atjson/source-url
@tim-evans tim-evans added 🐞 Bug This is identified as a bug or is fixing a bug 🐣 Good First Issue This is a good issue for first-time contributors labels Oct 7, 2019
@tim-evans tim-evans mentioned this issue Nov 14, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🐞 Bug This is identified as a bug or is fixing a bug 🐣 Good First Issue This is a good issue for first-time contributors
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix annotation defs CondeNast/atjson
1 participant
@tim-evans