Quadlet: exit 0 when there are no files to process #17398
Conversation
Quadlet should not exit with failure if no files to process have been found. Otherwise, even simple operations such as reloading systemd will fail as it retriggers generators. Fixes: containers#17374 Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <vrothberg@redhat.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
approved
|
/cherry-pick v4.4 |
|
@vrothberg: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of v4.4 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
LGTM (but I can't add the label myself) |
|
/lgtm |
|
@rhatdan: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of v4.4 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@rhatdan: new pull request created: #17410 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
locked - please file new issue/PR
Quadlet should not exit with failure if no files to process have been found. Otherwise, even simple operations such as reloading systemd will fail as it retriggers generators.
Fixes: #17374
Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg vrothberg@redhat.com
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?