Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency conventional-changelog to v3.1.15 #479

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 17, 2019

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 10, 2019

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
conventional-changelog dependencies patch 3.1.12 -> 3.1.15

Release Notes

conventional-changelog/conventional-changelog

v3.1.15

Compare Source

v3.1.14

Compare Source

v3.1.13

Compare Source


Renovate configuration

馃搮 Schedule: At any time (no schedule defined).

馃殾 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

鈾伙笍 Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or if you modify the PR title to begin with "rebase!".

馃敃 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

Newsflash: Renovate has joined WhiteSource, and is now free for all use. Learn more or view updated terms and privacy policies.

@coveralls
Copy link

@coveralls coveralls commented Nov 10, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.897% when pulling 54d5626 on renovate/conventional-changelog-3.x into 62d886c on master.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/conventional-changelog-3.x branch from fccd7a9 to 54d5626 Compare Nov 17, 2019
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency conventional-changelog to v3.1.14 fix(deps): update dependency conventional-changelog to v3.1.15 Nov 17, 2019
@jbottigliero jbottigliero merged commit 492e721 into master Nov 17, 2019
2 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/conventional-changelog-3.x branch Nov 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants