Chromium SSL/TLS interstitials broken #229

Closed
graxlop opened this Issue Apr 5, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@graxlop

graxlop commented Apr 5, 2016

My device is the Nexus 5, running the latest CopperheadOS.

Ever since one of the recent Chromium updates, I've noticed oddities with Chromium's SSL certificate interstitials and the detailed connection info. They seem to show either inaccurate info or just broken HTML code in the case of the interstitials.

Screenshots attached showing both problems. Some example interstitials can be found on the site below (ex. bad host, expired cert, etc.)

https://badssl.com/

screenshot_20160405-051809
screenshot_20160405-051833

@thestinger

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@thestinger

thestinger Apr 5, 2016

Contributor

There are no modifications to the Chromium build used in CopperheadOS, so there's nothing for us to do beyond continuing to update it.

Contributor

thestinger commented Apr 5, 2016

There are no modifications to the Chromium build used in CopperheadOS, so there's nothing for us to do beyond continuing to update it.

@thestinger

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@thestinger

thestinger Apr 5, 2016

Contributor

Do you use a different locale than US English? Might be worth trying that. I might not be asking it to build the other locales... don't know what I'd need to change though.

Contributor

thestinger commented Apr 5, 2016

Do you use a different locale than US English? Might be worth trying that. I might not be asking it to build the other locales... don't know what I'd need to change though.

@graxlop

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@graxlop

graxlop Apr 6, 2016

I'm using US English. It also seems to show up in chrome://history

screenshot_20160405-201908
screenshot_20160405-201636

graxlop commented Apr 6, 2016

I'm using US English. It also seems to show up in chrome://history

screenshot_20160405-201908
screenshot_20160405-201636

@thestinger

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@thestinger

thestinger Jul 23, 2016

Contributor

This is caused by not using the Chromium linker due to #202. I don't want to track upstream Chromium issues here. The only approach that will be taken here is fixing compatibility with the usual custom linker.

Contributor

thestinger commented Jul 23, 2016

This is caused by not using the Chromium linker due to #202. I don't want to track upstream Chromium issues here. The only approach that will be taken here is fixing compatibility with the usual custom linker.

@thestinger thestinger closed this Jul 23, 2016

@thestinger

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@thestinger

thestinger Jul 23, 2016

Contributor
@thestinger

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@thestinger

thestinger Jul 24, 2016

Contributor

Since #202 has been fixed, this problem will be avoided by using the Chromium linker again. The upstream bug is still present and I'd like to disable the Chromium linker again once it's resolved though.

Contributor

thestinger commented Jul 24, 2016

Since #202 has been fixed, this problem will be avoided by using the Chromium linker again. The upstream bug is still present and I'd like to disable the Chromium linker again once it's resolved though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment