Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
heartattack moments during first flash #294
Comments
thestinger
added
upstream
Type: enhancement
non-security-related
labels
Jun 2, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment Hide comment
thestinger
Jun 4, 2016
Contributor
I don't consider improving non-security-related upstream code to be in-scope. The stock factory images produce the same messages, and that's the experience I want to emulate. People can submit patches to AOSP if they want to improve Android in general, and those will be inherited by CopperheadOS.
|
I don't consider improving non-security-related upstream code to be in-scope. The stock factory images produce the same messages, and that's the experience I want to emulate. People can submit patches to AOSP if they want to improve Android in general, and those will be inherited by CopperheadOS. |
thestinger
closed this
Jun 4, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment Hide comment
anantshri
Jun 4, 2016
I would beg to differ on this. If my understanding of flashing scripts is right the messages are correct we are missing files. however that doesn't makes any difference for us. and hence it might be a good idea at our end to hide the error messages as its an unnecessary annoyance.
anantshri
commented
Jun 4, 2016
|
I would beg to differ on this. If my understanding of flashing scripts is right the messages are correct we are missing files. however that doesn't makes any difference for us. and hence it might be a good idea at our end to hide the error messages as its an unnecessary annoyance. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment Hide comment
thestinger
Jun 4, 2016
Contributor
There's nothing missing. It isn't our code, and the output doesn't differ from the stock factory images. You're also probably using a copy of fastboot from Google, so there's nothing I can do about the output it produces even if I considered it in-scope.
|
There's nothing missing. It isn't our code, and the output doesn't differ from the stock factory images. You're also probably using a copy of |
anantshri commentedJun 2, 2016
when a script gives out errors like
Might be a good idea to either hide those errors or ensure there is a message which confirms they are ignorable.