Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tooling] Better integration of Coq Bench #10418

Open
ejgallego opened this issue Jun 21, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@ejgallego
Copy link
Member

commented Jun 21, 2019

Since 2014 @clarus has maintained https://coq-bench.github.io/ ; indeed, this tooling seems to be not properly publicized, and as discussed in coq/opam-coq-archive#798 now an alternative was developed (http://check.ocamllabs.io/).

I've opened this issue to track integration of coq-bench within Coq's infrastructure. A few issues are:

  • infrastructure: currently coq-bench runs in @clarus servers; this is not ideal, what could be done about this?
  • notifications: check opam does send a message with changes in buildability to the OCamllabs Slack, could coq-bench do the same for Coq's gitter.
  • linking: where should we add links to the project, should it be in the manual? In Coq's web page?
@clarus

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jul 22, 2019

@ejgallego Thanks for your message. I am currently looking at if I can achieve connection with Gitter.

@ejgallego

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

commented Jul 22, 2019

Great @clarus ! I wonder which channel should it go, maybe we should create an OPAM channel?

I think you should be able to do it but just in case ping us on gitter if that doesn't work.

@clarus

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jul 22, 2019

OK thanks, good for the idea of creating an opam channel.

@clarus

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jul 24, 2019

Bench reports should now be available on this Gitter canal: https://gitter.im/coq/opam-bench-reports ! I will see over time if the implementation is stable.

@ejgallego

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

commented Jul 24, 2019

Very nice!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.