Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can't locate object method "map" via package "Mojo::Promise" #35

Closed
eserte opened this issue Jan 14, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Can't locate object method "map" via package "Mojo::Promise" #35

eserte opened this issue Jan 14, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@eserte
Copy link

@eserte eserte commented Jan 14, 2020

t/schema.t fails on a few of my smokers:

#   Failed test 'No tests run for subtest "report for dist+version"'
#   at t/schema.t line 352.
Can't locate object method "map" via package "Mojo::Promise" at /home/cpansand/.cpan/build/2020011403/CPAN-Testers-Schema-0.025-0/blib/lib/CPAN/Testers/Schema.pm line 302.
# Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not seen.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 7.
t/schema.t .................. 
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 1/7 subtests 

Statistical analysis suggests that this happens if Mojolicious is too old:

****************************************************************
Regression 'mod:Mojolicious'
****************************************************************
Name           	       Theta	      StdErr	 T-stat
[0='const']    	      0.0000	      0.0000	   0.00
[1='eq_8.12']  	      0.0000	      0.0000	   1.10
[2='eq_8.17']  	      1.0000	      0.0000	4282953288679619.50
[3='eq_8.27']  	      1.0000	      0.0000	5710604384906158.00
[4='eq_8.28']  	      1.0000	      0.0000	4945528468291543.00
[5='eq_8.29']  	      1.0000	      0.0000	5245525074720105.00
[6='eq_8.30']  	      1.0000	      0.0000	5972293020251494.00

R^2= 1.000, N= 52, K= 7
****************************************************************
@preaction

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@preaction preaction commented Jan 14, 2020

Argh. That method was added in 8.13. Thanks!

@preaction preaction closed this in 7db9a01 Jan 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.