Add architecture field #7
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
To support the new arm64 instances. Added as last argument for backwards compatibility.
|
Thanks for the PR -- as it turns out I had already written my own patch, adding a new I look forward to seeing your FreeBSD patches for building AMIs! I'd love to get this working soon. |
|
Yeah, I guess flags are okay. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18371 |
|
huh meanwhile NetBSD is already up on these instances |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To support the new arm64 instances.
Added as last argument for backwards compatibility.
the result of my experiments with the arm64 instance:
if_enabuilds fine for aarch64WARNING! Trying to fire up the kernel, but no device tree blob found!) / before the first message from the kernel :(