From 71afb4b1b75ff2131133aaa029c99c389f04ae42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anders Schau Knatten <anders@knatten.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 11:30:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [over.oper.general]: Avoid use of the term "basic type"

The term "basic type" is used twice in this note but it's never defined
anywhere. It's not used anywhere else either.
---
 source/overloading.tex | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/source/overloading.tex b/source/overloading.tex
index d7cac76f7c..fb40049638 100644
--- a/source/overloading.tex
+++ b/source/overloading.tex
@@ -3380,14 +3380,14 @@
 \pnum
 \indextext{operator}%
 \begin{note}
-The identities among certain predefined operators applied to basic types
+The identities among certain predefined operators applied to fundamental types
 (for example,
 \tcode{++a} $\equiv$
 \tcode{a+=1})
 need not hold for operator functions.
 Some predefined operators, such as
 \tcode{+=},
-require an operand to be an lvalue when applied to basic types;
+require an operand to be an lvalue when applied to fundamental types;
 this is not required by operator functions.
 \end{note}