[class.base.init] Add "direct" for _mem-initializer-id_-named members #8503
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
A _mem-initializer-id_ cannot be used to initialize a base class data member from a derived class constructor; therefore, we mean _direct_ non-static data member.
eisenwave
added
the
P1-Important
Member
|
P1. Looks like a normative wording defect with obvious fix. |
jensmaurer
approved these changes
Nov 11, 2025
tkoeppe
removed
the
P1-Important
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A mem-initializer-id cannot be used to initialize a base class data member from a derived class constructor; therefore, we mean direct non-static data member.