From 5de3a2167b24b1ff025854abbf0cf57d40f059dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 01:07:29 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [class.base.init] Add "direct" for _mem-initializer-id_-named
 members

A _mem-initializer-id_ cannot be used to initialize a base class
data member from a derived class constructor; therefore, we mean
_direct_ non-static data member.
---
 source/classes.tex | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/source/classes.tex b/source/classes.tex
index 742e3c6493..25307a3a66 100644
--- a/source/classes.tex
+++ b/source/classes.tex
@@ -5524,7 +5524,7 @@
 Unless the
 \grammarterm{mem-initializer-id}
 names the constructor's class,
-a non-static data member of the constructor's class, or
+a direct non-static data member of the constructor's class, or
 a direct or virtual base of that class,
 the
 \grammarterm{mem-initializer}