P1858 Generalized pack declaration and usage

[wg21bot]

P1858R0 Generalized pack declaration and usage (Barry Revzin)

[jfbastien]

First pass is probably better in EWGI, although this paper already looks thorough.

[theres-waldo]

EWG-I in Belfast

Encourage further work on generalizing packs
SF F N A SA
9 4 1 0 0

Pursure a syntax for language-level pack literals, e.g. <T,U>
SF F N A SA
2 4 5 1 0

Explore a keyword disambiguator rather than obj. ...field
SF F N A SA
2 5 3 3 0

[wg21bot]

P1858R1 Generalized pack declaration and usage (Barry Revzin)

[theres-waldo]

EWG-I in Prague

Poll: Split the structured binding customization point changes into another paper?

SF	F	N	A	SA
3	8	5	1	1

Consensus

Poll: Split the indexing facilities into another paper?

SF	F	N	A	SA
2	2	9	3	1

No consensus

Poll: Revise to address ambiguity with indexing syntax, and take revised paper to EWG?

SF	F	N	A	SA
9	6	1	1	0

Consensus

Next steps for paper: revise, take revised version to EWG

[wg21bot]

P1858R2 Generalized pack declaration and usage (Barry Revzin)

[jfbastien]

SG7 reflection should take a look at this to see what overlap there is, what makes sense to do in reflection versus language syntax like this, and where it's OK to have overlap.

[jfbastien]

Seen at yesterday's EWG telecon.

P1858 We're interested in continuing exploration of unpacking with "..." in more places.

SF	F	N	A	SA
9	13	2	1	1

P1858 we interested in continuin exploration of pack indexing, in this paper or in a separate paper

SF	F	N	A	SA
7	11	6	2	0

P1858: we're interested in continuing explorattion of packifying and slicing with [:] (or some other syntax), in this paper or in a separate paper.

SF	F	N	A	SA
3	7	8	6	1

[jfbastien]

Waiting on #1337

[hanickadot]

Closed based on communication with the author.