Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P2173 Attributes on Lambda-Expressions #882

Open
wg21bot opened this issue May 21, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

P2173 Attributes on Lambda-Expressions #882

wg21bot opened this issue May 21, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@wg21bot wg21bot commented May 21, 2020

P2173R0 Attributes on Lambda-Expressions (Daveed Vandevoorde, Inbal Levi, Ville Voutilainen)

@wg21bot wg21bot added the EWG label May 21, 2020
@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2020-telecon milestone May 21, 2020
@jfbastien
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfbastien jfbastien commented Jul 24, 2020

Discussed in EWG telecon on July 2nd:

P2173r0 is tentatively ready to move to CWG, once we can forward to Core (discussion on what attributes appertain to).

SF F N A SA
6 6 1 0 0

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the 2020-telecon milestone Dec 28, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the 2021-telecon milestone Dec 28, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to Ready for review in CWG Feb 2, 2021
@jfbastien
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfbastien jfbastien commented Mar 9, 2021

EWG February 2021 polls:

Poll: Forward P2173R0 "Attributes on Lambda-Expressions" to Core, thereby also fixing [CWG2097].

SF F N A SA
12 16 1 0 0

Poll outcome: consensus.

Salient comments:

  • This is a good addition because it makes lambdas more consistent with function call operators on named objects.
  • The attributes are defined hereby to pertain to the correct entity, so that we will not have unfortunate consistency issues with other function attributes.
  • I desperately need this functionality for multiple vendor-specific attributes.
  • This fills a functionality gap and makes the language more regular.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer moved this from Ready for review to Awaiting updated wording in CWG Mar 22, 2021
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer commented Mar 26, 2021

CWG 2021-03-22 telecon: Reviewed; needs updates.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer moved this from Awaiting updated wording to Ready for review in CWG May 1, 2021
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

@jensmaurer jensmaurer commented May 19, 2021

CWG 2021-05-03 telecon: Reviewed D2173R1; needs revision.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer moved this from Ready for review to Awaiting updated wording in CWG May 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
CWG
Awaiting updated wording
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
3 participants