Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

P2173 Attributes on Lambda-Expressions #882

Closed
wg21bot opened this issue May 21, 2020 · 7 comments · Fixed by cplusplus/draft#5273
Closed

P2173 Attributes on Lambda-Expressions #882

wg21bot opened this issue May 21, 2020 · 7 comments · Fixed by cplusplus/draft#5273
Labels
C++23 CWG plenary-approved straw-poll
Projects
Milestone

Comments

@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator

wg21bot commented May 21, 2020

P2173R0 Attributes on Lambda-Expressions (Daveed Vandevoorde, Inbal Levi, Ville Voutilainen)

@wg21bot wg21bot added the EWG label May 21, 2020
@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2020-telecon milestone May 21, 2020
@jfbastien
Copy link
Collaborator

jfbastien commented Jul 24, 2020

Discussed in EWG telecon on July 2nd:

P2173r0 is tentatively ready to move to CWG, once we can forward to Core (discussion on what attributes appertain to).

SF F N A SA
6 6 1 0 0

@jfbastien jfbastien added the EWG-vote-on-me label Sep 21, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer modified the milestones: 2020-telecon, 2021-telecon Dec 28, 2020
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to Ready for review in CWG Feb 2, 2021
@jfbastien
Copy link
Collaborator

jfbastien commented Mar 9, 2021

EWG February 2021 polls:

Poll: Forward P2173R0 "Attributes on Lambda-Expressions" to Core, thereby also fixing [CWG2097].

SF F N A SA
12 16 1 0 0

Poll outcome: consensus.

Salient comments:

  • This is a good addition because it makes lambdas more consistent with function call operators on named objects.
  • The attributes are defined hereby to pertain to the correct entity, so that we will not have unfortunate consistency issues with other function attributes.
  • I desperately need this functionality for multiple vendor-specific attributes.
  • This fills a functionality gap and makes the language more regular.

@jfbastien jfbastien added CWG and removed EWG EWG-vote-on-me labels Mar 9, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer moved this from Ready for review to Awaiting updated wording in CWG Mar 22, 2021
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Mar 26, 2021

CWG 2021-03-22 telecon: Reviewed; needs updates.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added the needs-revision label Mar 26, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer moved this from Awaiting updated wording to Ready for review in CWG May 1, 2021
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented May 19, 2021

CWG 2021-05-03 telecon: Reviewed D2173R1; needs revision.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer moved this from Ready for review to Awaiting updated wording in CWG May 19, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed this from the 2021-telecon milestone Nov 12, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer moved this from Awaiting updated wording to Ready for review in CWG Nov 17, 2021
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Dec 9, 2021

CWG telecon 2021-12-09: Approved D2173R1 after additional tweaks.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer removed the needs-revision label Dec 9, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer moved this from Ready for review to Approved for plenary vote in CWG Dec 9, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added C++23 straw-poll labels Dec 9, 2021
@wg21bot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wg21bot commented Dec 18, 2021

P2173R1 Attributes on Lambda-Expressions (Daveed Vandevoorde, Inbal Levi, Ville Voutilainen)

@wg21bot wg21bot added this to the 2021-telecon milestone Dec 18, 2021
@jensmaurer jensmaurer modified the milestones: 2021-telecon, 2022-telecon Jan 1, 2022
@cor3ntin cor3ntin added the plenary-approved label Feb 7, 2022
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

jensmaurer commented Feb 11, 2022

Approved by WG21 plenary 2022-02-07

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C++23 CWG plenary-approved straw-poll
Projects
CWG
Approved for plenary vote
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants