From 330b170e77bc40def4de547a8aa0cb5f48460895 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vladislav Yaroslavlev <vladon@vladon.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 01:52:26 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Update 04-Considering_Safety.md

---
 04-Considering_Safety.md | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/04-Considering_Safety.md b/04-Considering_Safety.md
index 8ca1849..fb4badd 100644
--- a/04-Considering_Safety.md
+++ b/04-Considering_Safety.md
@@ -94,11 +94,13 @@ Use the C++-style cast (static\_cast<>, dynamic\_cast<> ...) instead of the C-st
 double x = getX();
 int i = (int) x;
 
-// Good Idea
+// Not a Bad Idea
 int i = static_cast<int>(x);
 ```
 Additionally the C++ cast style is more visible and has the possibility to search for.
 
+But consider refactoring of program logic (for example, additional checking on overflow and underflow) if you need to cast `double` to `int`. Measure three times and cut 0.9999999999981 times.
+
 ## Additional Resources
 
 [How to Prevent The Next Heartbleed](http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/heartbleed.html) by David Wheeler is a good analysis of the current state of code safety and how to ensure safe code.