Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rename AsciiDoctor to Asciidoctor #7

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 24, 2016

Conversation

mojavelinux
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mojavelinux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Technically, this change should go a bit deeper. Asciidoctor is the processor. AsciiDoc is the file format. Therefore, whenever you are referring to something that is the asset, I think it should be "AsciiDoc". When you are referring to how the asset is processed, or options that get passed to the processor, then it is "Asciidoctor".

I'm in support of the name asciidoctor-asset-pipeline since this implementation specifically uses Asciidoctor. However, the name asciidoc-asset-pipeline would certainly make sense as well.

@craigburke craigburke merged commit e265390 into craigburke:master Jun 24, 2016
@craigburke
Copy link
Owner

@mojavelinux awesome. I think I'll keep the name asciidoctor-asset-pipeline since I'm ok tailoring it specifically to asciidoctor.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants