express, mongoDB tutorial is outdated #26

Open
srid opened this Issue Nov 21, 2010 · 5 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@srid

srid commented Nov 21, 2010

Perhaps we just need to add a "This article is outdated; see Express Guide and mongoose" or some such message on top of it?

http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/e9e17/blog_rolling_with_mongodb_express_and_nodejs/c16dayd

@creationix

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@creationix

creationix Nov 22, 2010

Owner

Yeah, I'm not sure what to do about the outdated articles. This one isn't written by me, and I certainly don't have the time to keep it up to date since I don't use express or mongodb. I did add meta information to all the articles showing how up to date they are on the right. You can contact Ciaran to see if he can update the article. I don't think he gets issues to this repo.

Owner

creationix commented Nov 22, 2010

Yeah, I'm not sure what to do about the outdated articles. This one isn't written by me, and I certainly don't have the time to keep it up to date since I don't use express or mongodb. I did add meta information to all the articles showing how up to date they are on the right. You can contact Ciaran to see if he can update the article. I don't think he gets issues to this repo.

@ciaranj

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@ciaranj

ciaranj Nov 22, 2010

Contributor

Yeah, it's mine, but I just don't have the time right now to go back through it and re-do it all :(. Frustratingly several the people have already done this, but didn't do it as forks to apply back here :(

It is on my list of things to revisit, but it's a long list !! The current 'up to date' information is the best available approach currently IMHO, as there are people who still seem to get something useful out of the article as is, from time to time :(

Contributor

ciaranj commented Nov 22, 2010

Yeah, it's mine, but I just don't have the time right now to go back through it and re-do it all :(. Frustratingly several the people have already done this, but didn't do it as forks to apply back here :(

It is on my list of things to revisit, but it's a long list !! The current 'up to date' information is the best available approach currently IMHO, as there are people who still seem to get something useful out of the article as is, from time to time :(

@creationix

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@creationix

creationix Nov 22, 2010

Owner

Ciaran, are there any forks/patches I should pull in?

Owner

creationix commented Nov 22, 2010

Ciaran, are there any forks/patches I should pull in?

@ciaranj

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@ciaranj

ciaranj Nov 22, 2010

Contributor

No sadly not, that's te issue, they got done in separate blogs iirc :( based-ons etc..

Contributor

ciaranj commented Nov 22, 2010

No sadly not, that's te issue, they got done in separate blogs iirc :( based-ons etc..

@ciaranj

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@ciaranj

ciaranj Jul 25, 2011

Contributor

Pull request now submitted....

Contributor

ciaranj commented Jul 25, 2011

Pull request now submitted....

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment