New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
storage: disable fdatasync() for atomic writes and bump c/storage to v1.19.2 #3747
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
1 similar comment
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
1 similar comment
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3747 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 40.31% 40.31%
=======================================
Files 105 105
Lines 8665 8665
=======================================
Hits 3493 3493
Misses 4861 4861
Partials 311 311 |
d2a9472
to
705b05a
Compare
|
/hold |
|
/retest |
|
/test e2e_crun |
|
@giuseppe mind opening a release-1.18 PR to get e2e-aws run data as well? Thanks! |
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
|
/retest |
|
/hold cancel |
|
Changes LGTM. If you could add "Bump c/storage to v1.19.2" or some such to the title, that would be appreciated. |
|
how to restart circleci? |
|
retriggered |
|
/lgtm |
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
drop unuseful fdatasync calls
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
fewer writes to the disk
Special notes for your reviewer:
I am vendoring a custom containers/storage branch (github.com/giuseppe/storage no-sync).
PR for containers/storage: containers/storage#620
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?