libressl: static declaration of 'OpenSSL_version_num' #2319

jungle-boogie · 2018-02-19T05:23:31Z

Hello,

Curl is failing to build on openBSD -current:

/home/jungle/bin/curl/lib/vtls/openssl.c:121:22: error: static declaration of 'OpenSSL_version_num' follows non-static declaration                                                     
static unsigned long OpenSSL_version_num(void)                                                                                                                                       
                     ^                                                                                                                                                               
/usr/include/openssl/crypto.h:340:15: note: previous declaration is here                                                                                                             
unsigned long OpenSSL_version_num(void);                                                                                                                                             
              ^                                                                                                                                                                      
1 error generated.                                                                                                                                                                   
*** Error 1 in . (lib/CMakeFiles/libcurl.dir/build.make:2943 'lib/CMakeFiles/libcurl.dir/vtls/openssl.c.o': cd /home/jungle/bin/curl/build/lib...)                                     
*** Error 1 in . (CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1014 'lib/CMakeFiles/libcurl.dir/all')                                                                                                        
*** Error 1 in /home/jungle/bin/curl/build (Makefile:141 'all')

See this openBSD commit to lib/libcrypto/crypto.h:
openbsd/src@3a94b19#diff-f5754718dcf4bb001cacd3a8e689bb01

Simply editing this file:
https://github.com/curl/curl/blob/master/lib/vtls/openssl.c#L121

and removing Static at the beginning of the line causes the build to successfully build.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

jay · 2018-02-19T05:48:46Z

Do you know the first version of libressl where this is fixed? I think it would be better to change it to #if (LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER < fixedver)

jungle-boogie · 2018-02-19T06:05:16Z

Hi @jay,

I don't know the first version. If you take a look at the openBSD commit I linked, it was only modified 5 days ago. My openBSD -current machine has libressl 2.7.0, if that helps.

jay · 2018-02-19T06:32:53Z

i see, it's the dev branch not release. It looks like they're transitioning from libressl 2.6.x to 3.0.x but it's unclear to me whether they'll continue with a 2.6.5 in parallel and whether it will have the api.

diff --git a/lib/vtls/openssl.c b/lib/vtls/openssl.c
index 2a6b3cf..f8b3fa8 100644
--- a/lib/vtls/openssl.c
+++ b/lib/vtls/openssl.c
@@ -117,7 +117,8 @@
 #define X509_get0_notBefore(x) X509_get_notBefore(x)
 #define X509_get0_notAfter(x) X509_get_notAfter(x)
 #define CONST_EXTS /* nope */
-#ifdef LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER
+#if defined(LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER) && \
+  (LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER <= 0x2060400fL)
 static unsigned long OpenSSL_version_num(void)
 {
   return LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER;

bagder · 2018-02-19T06:56:41Z

I think we should either get some confirmation of this from the libressl team, or wait for an actual release to see how this will end up. Otherwise I think the fix looks correct.

jay · 2018-02-19T07:27:50Z

I think we should either get some confirmation of this from the libressl team

@4a6f656c

sthen · 2018-02-19T11:45:52Z

0x2070000fL would be appropriate if checking for a version, however the only place cURL uses this is to print LibreSSL/$version, so decoding based on LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER is more appropriate here. This is what we're currently doing in ports:

Index: lib/vtls/openssl.c
--- lib/vtls/openssl.c.orig
+++ lib/vtls/openssl.c
@@ -117,12 +117,7 @@
 #define X509_get0_notBefore(x) X509_get_notBefore(x)
 #define X509_get0_notAfter(x) X509_get_notAfter(x)
 #define CONST_EXTS /* nope */
-#ifdef LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER
-static unsigned long OpenSSL_version_num(void)
-{
-  return LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER;
-}
-#else
+#ifndef LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER
 #define OpenSSL_version_num() SSLeay()
 #endif
 #endif
@@ -3527,7 +3522,11 @@ static size_t Curl_ossl_version(char *buffer, size_t s
   unsigned long ssleay_value;
   sub[2]='\0';
   sub[1]='\0';
+#ifdef LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER
+  ssleay_value = LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER;
+#else
   ssleay_value = OpenSSL_version_num();
+#endif
   if(ssleay_value < 0x906000) {
     ssleay_value = SSLEAY_VERSION_NUMBER;
     sub[0]='\0';

Results with this on OpenBSD -current:

$ curl -V
curl 7.58.0 (x86_64-unknown-openbsd6.2) libcurl/7.58.0 LibreSSL/2.7.0 zlib/1.2.3 nghttp2/1.30.0
Release-Date: 2018-01-24
Protocols: dict file ftp ftps gopher http https imap imaps pop3 pop3s rtsp smb smbs smtp smtps telnet tftp 
Features: AsynchDNS IPv6 Largefile NTLM NTLM_WB SSL libz HTTP2 UnixSockets HTTPS-proxy

4a6f656c · 2018-02-19T17:00:11Z

@jay - the additional API will appear in the 2.7.x release. There will only be a 2.6.5 release if there are security or bug fixes and such a release would not contain the API changes. As sthen notes, conditioning on 0x2070000fL is the correct version to use, if you want to take that route. For now, I'd recommend holding off until we finish the API churn, as there may be other fixes/changes.

bagder · 2018-02-20T07:02:16Z

thanks @4a6f656c, waiting a bit to see how this settles for real in a coming release seems like the sensible thing to do.

bagder · 2018-03-22T08:49:38Z

libressl 2.7.0 has been released so it makes sense to revisit this issue now...

donny-dont · 2018-03-23T20:32:21Z

@sthen 's fix is probably the most correct. Internally LibreSSL will print out its OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER which will always be 0x20000000L so doing a patch like the following would not get the desired behavior.

diff --git a/lib/vtls/openssl.c b/lib/vtls/openssl.c
index 2a6b3cfac..78a98b0ca 100644
--- a/lib/vtls/openssl.c
+++ b/lib/vtls/openssl.c
@@ -118,10 +118,13 @@
 #define X509_get0_notAfter(x) X509_get_notAfter(x)
 #define CONST_EXTS /* nope */
 #ifdef LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER
+/* For LibreSSL before 2.7.0 */
+#if (LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x2070000fL)
 static unsigned long OpenSSL_version_num(void)
 {
   return LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER;
 }
+#endif
 #else
 #define OpenSSL_version_num() SSLeay()
 #endif

jay · 2018-03-23T21:54:49Z

@sthen 's fix is probably the most correct. Internally LibreSSL will print out its OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER which will always be 0x20000000L so doing a patch like the following would not get the desired behavior.

Thank you for that information. Is there any way we can get LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER dynamically at runtime. I am thinking of what happens when, for example, a user's shared LibreSSL is upgraded. How would we get the actual version number to report to the user, is it possible through the API?

donny-dont · 2018-03-23T22:01:58Z

There's OpenSSL_version

const char *
OpenSSL_version(int t)
{
	switch (t) {
	case OPENSSL_VERSION:
		return OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT;
	case OPENSSL_BUILT_ON:
		return("built on: date not available");
	case OPENSSL_CFLAGS:
		return("compiler: information not available");
	case OPENSSL_PLATFORM:
		return("platform: information not available");
	case OPENSSL_DIR:
		return "OPENSSLDIR: \"" OPENSSLDIR "\"";
	case OPENSSL_ENGINES_DIR:
		return "ENGINESDIR: N/A";
	}
	return("not available");
}

/* These will change with each release of LibreSSL-portable */
#define LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER	0x2070000fL
#define LIBRESSL_VERSION_TEXT	"LibreSSL 2.7.0"

/* These will never change */
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER	0x20000000L
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT	LIBRESSL_VERSION_TEXT
#define OPENSSL_VERSION_PTEXT	" part of " OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT

One of the LibreSSL guys might want to chime in here on the best route. Just commenting because I recently hit this issue and am working around it currently.

jay · 2018-03-23T22:53:48Z

ok how about we parse from that

diff --git a/lib/vtls/openssl.c b/lib/vtls/openssl.c
index 2a6b3cf..74b78f5 100644
--- a/lib/vtls/openssl.c
+++ b/lib/vtls/openssl.c
@@ -3520,7 +3520,22 @@ static ssize_t ossl_recv(struct connectdata *conn, /* connection data */
 static size_t Curl_ossl_version(char *buffer, size_t size)
 {
 #ifdef OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL
-  return snprintf(buffer, size, OSSL_PACKAGE);
+  return snprintf(buffer, size, "%s", OSSL_PACKAGE);
+#elif LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER
+  const char *ver;
+  ver = OpenSSL_version(OPENSSL_VERSION);
+  if(ver && !strncmp(ver, "LibreSSL ", 9) && ver[9]) {
+    char *partial = strdup(&ver[9]); /* eg "2.7.0 beta" */
+    if(partial) {
+      char *p;
+      for(p = partial; *p; ++p) {
+        if(ISSPACE(*p))
+          *p = '_';
+      }
+      return snprintf(buffer, size, "%s/%s", OSSL_PACKAGE, partial);
+    }
+  }
+  return snprintf(buffer, size, "%s", OSSL_PACKAGE);
 #else /* OPENSSL_IS_BORINGSSL */
   char sub[3];
   unsigned long ssleay_value;

put aside for the moment not checking snprintf in band error

LibreSSL added a OpenSSL_version_num that always returns 0x020000000L. That conflicted with the workaround function we were using to return the compile-time LibreSSL actual version. This change removes that workaround in favor of extracting the actual version at runtime. Fixes curl#2319

jay · 2018-03-24T05:02:29Z

please test the pr at #2425 if you use libressl

LibreSSL added a OpenSSL_version_num that always returns 0x020000000L. That conflicted with the workaround function we were using to return the compile-time LibreSSL actual version. This change removes that workaround in favor of extracting the actual version at runtime. Fixes curl#2319

jungle-boogie · 2018-04-04T14:55:38Z

Hi,

Thanks for fixing this and sorry I didn't get a chance to specifically test the PR. However, now that it's merged into master, I can confirm the curl built successfully on openbsd -current from today's build with libressl 2.7.2.

$ curl --version
curl 7.60.0-DEV (OpenBSD) libcurl/7.60.0-DEV LibreSSL/2.7.2 zlib/1.2.3
Release-Date: [unreleased]
Protocols: dict file ftp ftps gopher http https imap imaps pop3 pop3s rtsp smb smbs smtp smtps telnet tftp
Features: AsynchDNS IPv6 Largefile NTLM SSL libz UnixSockets HTTPS-proxy

Thank you!

LibreSSL added a OpenSSL_version_num that always returns 0x020000000L. That conflicted with the workaround function we were using to return the compile-time LibreSSL actual version. This change removes that workaround in favor of extracting the actual version at runtime. Fixes curl#2319

jay added the build label Feb 19, 2018

jay added the on-hold label Feb 21, 2018

bagder changed the title ~~openBSD: static declaration of 'OpenSSL_version_num'~~ libressl: static declaration of 'OpenSSL_version_num' Mar 5, 2018

bagder added TLS and removed on-hold labels Mar 22, 2018

jay mentioned this issue Mar 24, 2018

openssl: retrieve reported libressl version at runtime #2425

Closed

bagder mentioned this issue Mar 30, 2018

build curl 7.59.0 against libressl 2.7.1 fail #2439

Closed

bagder closed this as completed in 7c90c93 Apr 4, 2018

janstary mentioned this issue Apr 27, 2018

libressl-devel: upgrade to 2.7.2 macports/macports-ports#1671

Merged

9 tasks

lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 3, 2018

libressl: static declaration of 'OpenSSL_version_num' #2319

libressl: static declaration of 'OpenSSL_version_num' #2319

jungle-boogie commented Feb 19, 2018

jay commented Feb 19, 2018

jungle-boogie commented Feb 19, 2018

jay commented Feb 19, 2018

bagder commented Feb 19, 2018

jay commented Feb 19, 2018

sthen commented Feb 19, 2018 •

edited

4a6f656c commented Feb 19, 2018

bagder commented Feb 20, 2018

bagder commented Mar 22, 2018

donny-dont commented Mar 23, 2018 •

edited

jay commented Mar 23, 2018

donny-dont commented Mar 23, 2018

jay commented Mar 23, 2018 •

edited

jay commented Mar 24, 2018

jungle-boogie commented Apr 4, 2018

libressl: static declaration of 'OpenSSL_version_num' #2319

libressl: static declaration of 'OpenSSL_version_num' #2319

Comments

jungle-boogie commented Feb 19, 2018

jay commented Feb 19, 2018

jungle-boogie commented Feb 19, 2018

jay commented Feb 19, 2018

bagder commented Feb 19, 2018

jay commented Feb 19, 2018

sthen commented Feb 19, 2018 • edited

4a6f656c commented Feb 19, 2018

bagder commented Feb 20, 2018

bagder commented Mar 22, 2018

donny-dont commented Mar 23, 2018 • edited

jay commented Mar 23, 2018

donny-dont commented Mar 23, 2018

jay commented Mar 23, 2018 • edited

jay commented Mar 24, 2018

jungle-boogie commented Apr 4, 2018

sthen commented Feb 19, 2018 •

edited

donny-dont commented Mar 23, 2018 •

edited

jay commented Mar 23, 2018 •

edited