New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

strtoofft: overhaul to address integer overflow risks globally #1758

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@bagder
Member

bagder commented Aug 10, 2017

... make sure we bail out on overflows.

Reported-by: Brian Carpenter

bagder added some commits Aug 12, 2017

strtoofft: reduce integer overflow risks globally
... make sure we bail out on overflows.

Reported-by: Brian Carpenter

@curl curl deleted a comment from coveralls Aug 12, 2017

@curl curl deleted a comment from coveralls Aug 12, 2017

@coveralls

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@coveralls

coveralls Aug 13, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 75.067% when pulling ffa73dd on bagder/number-parsing-overhaul into 6bde13a on master.

coveralls commented Aug 13, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 75.067% when pulling ffa73dd on bagder/number-parsing-overhaul into 6bde13a on master.

@bagder bagder closed this in ff50fe0 Aug 14, 2017

@bagder bagder deleted the bagder/number-parsing-overhaul branch Aug 14, 2017

@dfandrich

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dfandrich

dfandrich Aug 25, 2017

Collaborator

This broke non-MSVC builds that need HAVE_STRTOLL, e.g. https://curl.haxx.se/dev/log.cgi?id=20170825014632-29789#prob8

Collaborator

dfandrich commented Aug 25, 2017

This broke non-MSVC builds that need HAVE_STRTOLL, e.g. https://curl.haxx.se/dev/log.cgi?id=20170825014632-29789#prob8

bagder added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2017

@bagder

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@bagder

bagder Aug 25, 2017

Member

@dfandrich can you perhaps try out #1829 manually and see if it is good enough for this?

Member

bagder commented Aug 25, 2017

@dfandrich can you perhaps try out #1829 manually and see if it is good enough for this?

bagder added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment