rustls: verify that verifier_builder is not NULL#19756
Closed
bagder wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Since this function returns allocated resources there is probably at least a theoretical risk this can return NULL. Pointed out by ZeroPath
Member
Author
|
augment review |
bagder
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 28, 2025 23:01
![augmentcode[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1027498?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Analysis of PR #19756 at b91f5f5f: Test ../../tests/http/test_17_ssl_use.py::TestSSLUse::test_17_05_bad_ip_addr[h3] failed, which has NOT been flaky recently, so there could be a real issue in this PR. Note that this test has failed in 2 different CI jobs (the link just goes to one of them). Generated by Testclutch |
Contributor
|
LGTM 👍 Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since this function returns allocated resources there is probably at least a theoretical risk this can return NULL.
Pointed out by ZeroPath