Skip to content

test651: curl_formadd with huge COPYCONTENTS#1988

Closed
bagder wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
bagder/test-huge-COPYCONTENTS
Closed

test651: curl_formadd with huge COPYCONTENTS#1988
bagder wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
bagder/test-huge-COPYCONTENTS

Conversation

@bagder
Copy link
Member

@bagder bagder commented Oct 12, 2017

No description provided.

... shows a bug after the first 16K on 7.56.0

Code-by: Jeroen Ooms
@bagder
Copy link
Member Author

bagder commented Oct 12, 2017

ping @monnerat, we got an interesting regression reported by @jeroen that I just managed to reproduce with this test case and the amended commit. It shows that the output data is somehow repeating after the first 16K!

@bagder
Copy link
Member Author

bagder commented Oct 12, 2017

I think that fixes it, just needs to run through the CI to make sure nothing breaks while I run some more tests locally as well.

Copy link
Contributor

@monnerat monnerat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oups, my bad !
16K is the read buffer size and we had no test with more memory data... good catch.
I completely agree with the fix.

@bagder bagder closed this in 5f9e2ca Oct 13, 2017
@bagder bagder deleted the bagder/test-huge-COPYCONTENTS branch October 13, 2017 05:56
@jeroen
Copy link
Contributor

jeroen commented Oct 13, 2017

Thanks for the quick fix! Are there plans for a patch release soon, or should i better cherry pick the patch into my deployment?

@bagder
Copy link
Member Author

bagder commented Oct 13, 2017

I have had discussions with some peeps about about a possible patch release but not properly (ie not on the mailing list) and nothing has been decided yet. And even if we will decide to make one, it will be at a set date at least one week into the future.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants