Conversation
|
Apologies for neglecting my branch! Thank you for picking this up. :) |
e8acb50 to
c6a8ad8
Compare
|
Okay, got some final issues ironed out. This should be good to go now. |
c6a8ad8 to
d29ae12
Compare
|
It occurred to me just now that this should probably be expanded to work on non-HTTP protocols. |
|
You'll see that test 1119 and 1139 fail due to:
|
|
Good points. I'll look into adding those. |
|
Hi, I really would like to get this feature merged into curl and would be happy to help. @elyscape, please advice if I I can help you in any way. I have compiled and tested your fork, and it works just as I personally would expect. If there is any documentation I can do for you, I will happily help. |
|
@maglub Sorry for the delay. I'll try to get the rest of the documentation done this week. |
d29ae12 to
7ea372c
Compare
|
Rebased onto master again with documentation added. |
|
If you run test 1119 and 1139 locally you'll see that they fail: 1119 - because 1139 - because |
docs/cmdline-opts/haproxy-protocol.d
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For convenience to command line users, do you think it would make sense to just call it --haproxy ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would opt for --haproxy-protocol or --proxy-protocol, as the protocol could be used by other implementations too and is more descriptive.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In my original PR I used --proxy-protocol and was recommended to include haproxy in the argument so as not to cause confusion with other proxy-related options.
7ea372c to
0716721
Compare
|
@bagder Tests fixed. I had put |
|
The red CI build is because |
This argument is unnecessary here.
0716721 to
1e4edfd
Compare
|
@bagder Fixed and rebased onto master. Apologies for the delay; I was on vacation. |
|
Ah, looks like the version I have in there is wrong. Let me know if everything else looks good and I can fix it. |
|
Well, 7.59.0 came out before this got merged, so that concern is no longer relevant. Woo! @bagder When you get a chance, please take another look at this. Thank you! |
|
Thanks for all the work on this. Please try it out in the master branch now! |
|
Thank you all for helping get this into master! <3
…On 17 March 2018 at 10:51, Daniel Stenberg ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for all the work on this. Please try it out in the master branch
now!
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2162 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABUhDgc18ayFAcLzKu-zFHV2Jvt2UEY6ks5tfOqhgaJpZM4Q4kUU>
.
--
Sent from the Outside Broadcast Unit
|
This is a rebase of #1135 onto master. It also adds some additional error checking to that code.
Closes #1135.