unit1612: Fixed the compilation of the new unit test #5024
I think as a requirement it's probably too strict. Keywords like fix/add/remove or whatever may help communicate an overall effect (which is then fully spelled out in the commit message), and the initial uppercase style can be found in the history occasionally. I have some bias. Take for example
It could be done with some limitation in the subject as
I think the first one communicates better. I'm not sure if everyone shares that view.
Follow on from 3f74e5e. Due to a typo in Makefile.inc unit1611 was used as test1612. Once corrected there were a few minor compilation issues to fix.