Skip to content

Lift 'ignore' is now deprecated configuration option - #8082

Closed
doddi wants to merge 1 commit into
curl:masterfrom
doddi:fix_deprecated_lift_config
Closed

doddi wants to merge 1 commit into
curl:masterfrom
doddi:fix_deprecated_lift_config

Conversation

@doddi

@doddi doddi commented Dec 1, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Configuration for Lift has now deprecated the use of ignore and has been replaced with ignoreRules, https://help.sonatype.com/lift/configuration-reference#ConfigurationReference-in-repo-optionsIn-RepoOptions(The.lift.toml).

I noticed the recent PRs had been failing, this PR changes to the new configuration. Lift analysis is now running successfully https://lift.sonatype.com/results/github.com/doddi/curl/01FNVA0ZNPNZG9S6X1K34XFJ4R

@bagder

bagder commented Dec 1, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

"lift — All analyzers failed for the supported languages. Check your Lift config"

Doesn't sound like this is enough to make lift work...? (and isn't it weird that it gives this message the happy green checkmark?)

@doddi

doddi commented Dec 2, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

"lift — All analyzers failed for the supported languages. Check your Lift config"

Doesn't sound like this is enough to make lift work...? (and isn't it weird that it gives this message the happy green checkmark?)

I believe this is enough to make it work correctly, clicking through to the console results shows successful results https://lift.sonatype.com/result/curl/curl/01FNVBDQHRXVEFM0RY72044V3M compared to previously outright failing due to configuration issues https://lift.sonatype.com/result/curl/curl/01FNV1EGQ9DAQ6TK1WAT7ZZ7AP.

There is an outstanding issue with Lift that is currently getting looked at whereby if the master branch analysing had been failing it will unfortunately default to showing this type of message. 'All analyzers failed for the supporting languages'

@bagder

bagder commented Dec 3, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!

@bagder bagder closed this in f67b4d3 Dec 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants