Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upFix rewording #865
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
mention-bot
commented
Jun 7, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jay
Jun 7, 2016
Member
I agree with what you're trying to do here but it is still not technically correct. The integer doesn't point to the number. It would probably be better understood if we were colloquial like 'running_handles receives the number of running easy handles' or something simple like that.
|
I agree with what you're trying to do here but it is still not technically correct. The integer doesn't point to the number. It would probably be better understood if we were colloquial like 'running_handles receives the number of running easy handles' or something simple like that. |
jay
closed this
in
9295205
Jun 9, 2016
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jay
Jun 9, 2016
Member
Thanks, it landed as: "At return, running_handles points to the number of running easy handles within the multi handle."
|
Thanks, it landed as: "At return, running_handles points to the number of running easy handles within the multi handle." |
m6w6 commentedJun 7, 2016
Seems like a phrase was about to be replaced with another one, but only the addition made it in, not the removal.