Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dev #5

Merged
merged 6 commits into from May 10, 2019
Merged

Dev #5

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter...
Filter file types
Jump to…
Jump to file or symbol
Failed to load files and symbols.

Always

Just for now

Update ietf-104-report.html

  • Loading branch information...
cyberphone committed May 8, 2019
commit 75445f41e3d3101b7428ffd8fb33fc5b99134c90
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
signed message data in specific signature containers
</li>
</ul>
None of the Open Banking systems out there have to date choosen
None of the Open Banking systems out there have to date chosen
this route, they all build on variants using clear text JSON data.
That none of them utilize JCS is quite logical since
JCS is (correctly) not perceived as a standard.
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
You should have stayed with the ES6 predictive parsing/serialization scheme
</div>
<div class="response">
That had been cool but the sentiment among other JSON tool vendors were
That had been cool but the sentiment among other JSON tool vendors was
that "ECMA got it all wrong" so
<u>I was forced to select another and more conventional route</u>.
Fortunately, the revised scheme turned out to be very simple to get running
ProTip! Use n and p to navigate between commits in a pull request.
You can’t perform that action at this time.