Dialogue Errors Found During Chapters 5, 6, and 7

[Wandering-Heiho]

Decided to include all three of these chapters as there weren't too many errors found in a single one.

Chapter 5

I believe the contraction Nayuta is supposed to say is we've (we have) and not we're (we are).

I believe this is at line 200 in script/input/mp_5098.tsv

---

Chapter 6

Small change here, pretty sure there should be an "and" after Creha.

Found at line 65 in script/input/mp_0112.tsv

---

Pretty sure Dorado meant to say "can" and not "can't" here.

Located at line 19 in script/input/mp_0001c.tsv

---

Chapter 7

Pretty sure this is supposed to be "With that," and not "What that,".

I believe this is line 53 in script/input/7098.tsv

---

Grammatically, this should either be:
"Yeah... Thanks to your guy's little intervention."
or
"Yeah... Thanks to you guys intervening."

Found at line 91 in script/input/7098.tsv

---

I believe there should be a "to" before "lose".

At line 412 in script/input/7098.tsv

---

MISC

Something small about the Ruins Rock Salt description. All my searching seems to show that there are 2 c's in occurring, while this description only has 1.

line 716 in text/input/item.tsv

---

That's all I have for now.

[dackst]

I believe the contraction Nayuta is supposed to say is we've (we have) and not we're (we are).

I don't think it's completely wrong, but other examples I can find of it being used off Google are a little strange. It should be "If that's decided" now.

Pretty sure Dorado meant to say "can" and not "can't" here.

I did this as an attempt of expressing uncertainty, like "Isn't there anything we can do?" Expressing uncertainty was my interpretation of machine translators throwing around "somehow" all over the place. There's probably better ways of expressing that than what's there currently, though.

Grammatically, this should either be:
"Yeah... Thanks to your guy's little intervention."
or
"Yeah... Thanks to you guys intervening."

I'm not so sure, this seems to be a point of contention, with no single agreed upon answer.
https://www.thecut.com/2016/11/your-guys-is-american-english-at-it-roughspun-best.html
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/12277/what-is-the-possessive-of-you-guys
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/you_guys

If we search the scripts of other Trails games, your guys' is used a bunch of times (but interestingly not once in the Sky games), you guys' is used once, and your guy's is never used.

While I think Cygna's dialogue especially could stand to be spiced up with some slang, it might flow a little better in this case to get rid of the guys altogether.

[Wandering-Heiho]

I'm not so sure, this seems to be a point of contention, with no single agreed upon answer.
https://www.thecut.com/2016/11/your-guys-is-american-english-at-it-roughspun-best.html
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/12277/what-is-the-possessive-of-you-guys
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/you_guys

If we search the scripts of other Trails games, your guys' is used a bunch of times (but interestingly not once in the Sky games), you guys' is used once, and your guy's is never used.

Yeah, that was my mistake, I meant to type your guys' but misplaced the apostrophe. Sorry about that.