Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Seems to be an issue with expanding UUID value #34

Closed
vicmosin opened this issue Nov 6, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Seems to be an issue with expanding UUID value #34

vicmosin opened this issue Nov 6, 2015 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@vicmosin
Copy link

@vicmosin vicmosin commented Nov 6, 2015

I am facing the following issue: once I pass an UUID value into parameters map and expands the template, the final result contains the UUID's internal properties such as mostSigBits and leastSigBits instead of simple string representation. Converting the UUID to string before passing to expand method solves the problem

@damnhandy
Copy link
Owner

@damnhandy damnhandy commented Nov 6, 2015

Can you post the output you're seeing? I think I know what might be going on. This would likely address issues like #26 and others.

@vicmosin
Copy link
Author

@vicmosin vicmosin commented Nov 6, 2015

http://localhost:7070/chats?id=-7375646386867656971,7078318184015086714

original uri: http://localhost:7070/chats{?page,size,sort,filter,id}

@damnhandy damnhandy added this to the 2.1 milestone Nov 7, 2015
damnhandy added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 7, 2015
@damnhandy
Copy link
Owner

@damnhandy damnhandy commented Nov 7, 2015

Fixed in the 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT if you could give it a whirl and see if verify if the behavior is what you're expecting, i'll close this issue.

@vicmosin
Copy link
Author

@vicmosin vicmosin commented Nov 8, 2015

Confirmed, 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT fixes the issue

@damnhandy damnhandy closed this Nov 8, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.