Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge kimo fixes #28

Draft
wants to merge 137 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Merge kimo fixes #28

wants to merge 137 commits into from

Conversation

markuspg
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi damphyr,

we'd like to use rutema for a current project and merge the changes from the Zuehlke fork of rutema. Would it be possible to merge these and update the Ruby gem?

I tried to do the necessary steps and update the dependencies too.

Best,
markuspg

Kita, Morgan and others added 21 commits August 25, 2017 18:42
…rown.

Ensure that setup and teardown are not run on suite setup or teardowns.
Fix statistics for test summary.
Added spec name to context data for running test steps.
…t in ensure of run function of runner.

Added skip_on_error to allow skipping a step if an error occured, separate from continue
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 30, 2020

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 87.462% when pulling 4e42d9a on markuspg:merge_kimo_fixes into 4e8685d on damphyr:master.

@markuspg markuspg force-pushed the merge_kimo_fixes branch 3 times, most recently from 26a69a9 to 39c75fd Compare August 1, 2020 12:10
…o_fixes

This merge mostly goes with the changes already done by markuspg. Since
the logic changes were heavily inspired by kimo his branch is included
for the purpose of documentation and crediting his work.
* add an additional :uninitialized state to STATUS_CODES
* fix all RuboCop offenses
* make test string better distinguishable (changes output formatting!)
This change is done so that this file is in line with the others.
Since basically all options except the parser are optional these were
more misleading than helpful.
This is in line with the other exceptions defined by rutema.
This should be better than just silently discarding the inserted value.
@markuspg markuspg force-pushed the merge_kimo_fixes branch 2 times, most recently from 4e42d9a to 4500a7b Compare August 24, 2020 21:14
@markuspg markuspg marked this pull request as draft August 25, 2020 16:02
@damphyr
Copy link
Owner

damphyr commented Oct 27, 2020

Too many things at once in this PR.
I'd like one PR per actual change. Skip the rubocop changes for now, there are issues with that - ranging from a personal dislike to some of the rules to spurious changes that are contrary to the already established style used in rutema for 15 years.

So, linters are good but sometimes not good enough.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants