Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Conform to ResultOperationType where appropriate #148

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 20, 2015
Merged

Conform to ResultOperationType where appropriate #148

merged 1 commit into from Dec 20, 2015

Conversation

danthorpe
Copy link
Member

  • UserLocationOperation

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 64.76%

Merging #148 into development will increase coverage by +0.08% as of 7988b76

@@            development    #148   diff @@
===========================================
  Files                48      48       
  Stmts              2520    2526     +6
  Branches              0       0       
  Methods                               
===========================================
+ Hit                1630    1636     +6
  Partial               0       0       
  Missed              890     890

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 7988b76

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

danthorpe added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2015
@danthorpe
Merge pull request #148 from danthorpe/feature/OPR-148_confirm_to_res…
5bd629b 
…ult_operation_type

Conform to ResultOperationType where appropriate
@danthorpe danthorpe merged commit 5bd629b into development Dec 20, 2015
@danthorpe danthorpe deleted the feature/OPR-148_confirm_to_result_operation_type branch January 4, 2016 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@danthorpe @codecov-io