Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VM should implement lazy initialization of static variables #3558

Closed
gbracha opened this issue Jun 12, 2012 · 8 comments
Closed

VM should implement lazy initialization of static variables #3558

gbracha opened this issue Jun 12, 2012 · 8 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@gbracha
Copy link
Contributor

@gbracha gbracha commented Jun 12, 2012

Per language issue #3557.

@gbracha
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gbracha gbracha commented Jun 12, 2012

Issue #3554 has been merged into this issue.

@gbracha
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gbracha gbracha commented Jun 12, 2012

See also issue #3549 . This should be fixed only after the libraries have been converted to use const variables where needed. Per spec 10.1.

@iposva-google
Copy link
Contributor

@iposva-google iposva-google commented Jun 22, 2012

Set owner to @crelier.
Added Accepted label.

@crelier
Copy link
Member

@crelier crelier commented Jul 24, 2012

Added Duplicate label.
Marked as being merged into #3551.

@DartBot
Copy link

@DartBot DartBot commented Jul 24, 2012

This comment was originally written by @mhausner


We actually track this feature separately from 3551. I'll work on this next, after 3551.


Set owner to @mhausner.
Added Accepted label.
Marked as being merged into #.

@DartBot
Copy link

@DartBot DartBot commented Jul 27, 2012

This comment was originally written by @mhausner


Marked this as being blocked by #3552.

@DartBot
Copy link

@DartBot DartBot commented Sep 13, 2012

This comment was originally written by @mhausner


This is checked in at r12321.


Added Fixed label.

@lrhn
Copy link
Member

@lrhn lrhn commented Jun 4, 2013

There is still a test (language/lazt_static3_test) marked as failing and referring to this bug?

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.