Repository navigation
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathBenchmark.Rmd
More file actions
339 lines (285 loc) · 13.1 KB
/
Copy pathBenchmark.Rmd
File metadata and controls
339 lines (285 loc) · 13.1 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
---
title: "Benchmarking phyloregion"
author: "Barnabas H. Daru, Piyal Karunarathne & Klaus Schliep"
date: "November 15, 2022"
output: rmarkdown::html_vignette
bibliography: phyloregion.bib
vignette: >
%\VignetteIndexEntry{Benchmarking phyloregion}
%\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown}
%\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
---
## Benchmarking `phyloregion` with comparable packages
In this vignette, we benchmark `phyloregion` against other similar `R`
packages in analyses of standard alpha diversity metrics commonly
used in conservation, such as phylogenetic diversity and phylogenetic
endemism as well as metrics for analyzing compositional turnover (e.g.,
beta diversity and phylogenetic beta diversity). Specifically, we
compare `phyloregion`'s functions with available packages for efficiency
in memory allocation and computation speed in various biogeographic analyses.
First, load the packages for the benchmarking:
```r
library(ape)
library(Matrix)
library(bench)
library(ggplot2)
# packages we benchmark
library(phyloregion)
library(betapart)
library(picante)
library(vegan)
library(hilldiv)
library(BAT)
library(pez)
```
We will use a small data set which comes with `phyloregion`. This dataset
consists of a dated phylogeny of the woody plant species of southern
Africa along with their geographical distributions. The dataset comes from a study that maps tree diversity hotspots in southern Africa [@Daru2015ddi].
```r
data(africa)
# subset matrix
X_sparse <- africa$comm[1:30, ]
X_sparse <- X_sparse[, colSums(X_sparse)>0]
X_dense <- as.matrix(X_sparse)
Xt_dense <- t(X_dense)
object.size(X_sparse)
```
```
## 76504 bytes
```
```r
object.size(X_dense)
```
```
## 134752 bytes
```
```r
dim(X_sparse)
```
```
## [1] 30 401
```
To make results comparable, it is often desirable to make sure
that the taxa in different datasets match each other [@Kembel2010].
For example, the community matrix in the `hilldiv` package [@hilldiv]
needs to be transposed. These transformations can influence the execution
times of the function, often only marginally.
Thus, to benchmark `phyloregion` against other packages, we here use the
package `bench` [@bench2020] because it returns execution times and
provides estimates of memory allocations for each computation.
## 1. Analysis of alpha diversity
#### 1.1. Benchmarking `phyloregion` for analysis of phylogenetic diversity
For analysis of alpha diversity commonly used in conservation such as phylogenetic
diversity - the sum of all phylogenetic branch lengths within an area [@Faith1992]
- `phyloregion` is 31 to 284 times faster and 67 to 192 times
memory efficient, compared to other packages!
```r
tree <- africa$phylo
tree <- keep.tip(tree, colnames(X_sparse))
pd_picante <- function(x, tree){
res <- picante::pd(x, tree)[,1]
names(res) <- row.names(x)
res
}
pd_pez <- function(x, tree){
dat <- pez::comparative.comm(tree, x)
res <- pez::.pd(dat)[,1]
names(res) <- row.names(x)
res
}
pd_hilldiv <- function(x, tree) hilldiv::index_div(x, tree, index="faith")
pd_phyloregion <- function(x, tree) phyloregion::PD(x, tree)
res1 <- bench::mark(picante=pd_picante(X_dense, tree),
hilldiv=pd_hilldiv(Xt_dense,tree=tree),
pez=pd_pez(X_dense, tree),
phyloregion=pd_phyloregion(X_sparse, tree))
summary(res1)
```
```
## # A tibble: 4 × 6
## expression min median `itr/sec` mem_alloc `gc/sec`
## <bch:expr> <bch:tm> <bch:tm> <dbl> <bch:byt> <dbl>
## 1 picante 97.85ms 112.45ms 8.22 59.6MB 9.87
## 2 hilldiv 762.42ms 762.42ms 1.31 170.1MB 3.93
## 3 pez 108.59ms 122.83ms 8.16 60.4MB 8.16
## 4 phyloregion 2.82ms 3.23ms 268. 909.8KB 5.99
```
```r
autoplot(res1)
```

#### 1.2. Benchmarking `phyloregion` for analysis of phylogenetic endemism
Another benchmark for `phyloregion` is in the analysis of phylogenetic
endemism, the degree to which phylogenetic diversity is restricted to
any given area [@Rosauer2009]. Here, we found that `phyloregion` is
160 times faster and 489 times efficient in memory allocation.
```r
tree <- africa$phylo
tree <- keep.tip(tree, colnames(X_sparse))
pe_pez <- function(x, tree){
dat <- pez::comparative.comm(tree, x)
res <- pez::pez.endemism(dat)[,1]
names(res) <- row.names(x)
res
}
pe_phyloregion <- function(x, tree) phyloregion::phylo_endemism(x, tree)
res2 <- bench::mark(pez=pe_pez(X_dense, tree),
phyloregion=pe_phyloregion(X_sparse, tree))
summary(res2)
```
```
## # A tibble: 2 × 6
## expression min median `itr/sec` mem_alloc `gc/sec`
## <bch:expr> <bch:tm> <bch:tm> <dbl> <bch:byt> <dbl>
## 1 pez 630.38ms 630.38ms 1.59 493.88MB 9.52
## 2 phyloregion 2.94ms 3.19ms 280. 1.06MB 3.98
```
```r
autoplot(res2)
```

## 2. Analysis of compositional turnover (beta diversity)
#### 2.1. Benchmarking `phyloregion` for analysis of taxonomic beta diversity
For analysis of taxonomic beta diversity, which compares diversity between
communities [@Koleff2003], `phyloregion` has marginal advantage
over other packages. Nonetheless, it is 1-39 times faster and allocates 2 to 110
times less memory than other packages.
```r
chk_fun <- function(target, current)
all.equal(target, current, check.attributes = FALSE)
fun_phyloregion <- function(x) as.matrix(phyloregion::beta_diss(x)[[3]])
fun_betapart <- function(x) as.matrix(betapart::beta.pair(x)[[3]])
fun_vegan <- function(x) as.matrix(vegan::vegdist(x, binary=TRUE))
fun_BAT <- function(x) as.matrix(BAT::beta(x, func = "Soerensen")[[1]])
res3 <- bench::mark(phyloregion=fun_phyloregion(X_sparse),
betapart=fun_betapart(X_dense),
vegan=fun_vegan(X_dense),
BAT=fun_BAT(X_dense), check=chk_fun)
summary(res3)
```
```
## # A tibble: 4 × 6
## expression min median `itr/sec` mem_alloc `gc/sec`
## <bch:expr> <bch:tm> <bch:tm> <dbl> <bch:byt> <dbl>
## 1 phyloregion 598.5µs 689µs 1210. 428.2KB 4.39
## 2 betapart 849.4µs 909µs 1024. 594.1KB 10.3
## 3 vegan 946.8µs 992µs 958. 1016.1KB 7.01
## 4 BAT 44.5ms 47ms 20.9 31.8MB 8.95
```
```r
autoplot(res3)
```

#### 2.2. Benchmarking `phyloregion` for analysis of phylogenetic beta diversity
For analysis of phylogenetic turnover (beta-diversity) among communities - the
proportion of shared phylogenetic branch lengths between communities [@Graham2008] - `phyloregion` is 300-400 times faster and allocates 100-600 times less memory!
```r
fun_phyloregion <- function(x, tree) phyloregion::phylobeta(x, tree)[[3]]
fun_betapart <- function(x, tree) betapart::phylo.beta.pair(x, tree)[[3]]
fun_picante <- function(x, tree) 1 - picante::phylosor(x, tree)
fun_BAT <- function(x, tree) BAT::beta(x, tree, func = "Soerensen")[[1]]
chk_fun <- function(target, current)
all.equal(target, current, check.attributes = FALSE)
res4 <- bench::mark(picante=fun_picante(X_dense, tree),
betapart=fun_betapart(X_dense, tree),
BAT=fun_BAT(X_dense, tree),
phyloregion=fun_phyloregion(X_sparse, tree), check=chk_fun)
summary(res4)
```
```
## # A tibble: 4 × 6
## expression min median `itr/sec` mem_alloc `gc/sec`
## <bch:expr> <bch:tm> <bch:tm> <dbl> <bch:byt> <dbl>
## 1 picante 2.25s 2.25s 0.444 1.24GB 2.66
## 2 betapart 2.05s 2.05s 0.489 1.24GB 2.93
## 3 BAT 1.41s 1.41s 0.712 293.64MB 0.712
## 4 phyloregion 4.21ms 4.49ms 175. 1.12MB 1.99
```
```r
autoplot(res4)
```

Note that for this test, `picante` returns a similarity matrix while
`betapart`, and `phyloregion` return a dissimilarity matrix.
## Session Information
```r
sessionInfo()
```
```
## R version 4.2.1 (2022-06-23)
## Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin17.0 (64-bit)
## Running under: macOS Monterey 12.6
##
## Matrix products: default
## LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.2/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib
##
## locale:
## [1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
##
## attached base packages:
## [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
##
## other attached packages:
## [1] pez_1.2-4 BAT_2.9.2 hilldiv_1.5.1 picante_1.8.2
## [5] nlme_3.1-157 vegan_2.6-2 lattice_0.20-45 permute_0.9-7
## [9] betapart_1.5.6 phyloregion_1.0.7 bench_1.1.2 Matrix_1.5-3
## [13] ape_5.6-2 knitr_1.39 ggplot2_3.3.6
##
## loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
## [1] utf8_1.2.2 proto_1.0.0 ks_1.13.5
## [4] tidyselect_1.2.0 htmlwidgets_1.5.4 grid_4.2.1
## [7] combinat_0.0-8 pROC_1.18.0 animation_2.7
## [10] munsell_0.5.0 codetools_0.2-18 clustMixType_0.2-15
## [13] interp_1.1-3 future_1.29.0 withr_2.5.0
## [16] profmem_0.6.0 colorspace_2.0-3 highr_0.9
## [19] rstudioapi_0.13 geometry_0.4.6.1 stats4_4.2.1
## [22] ggsignif_0.6.4 listenv_0.8.0 slam_0.1-50
## [25] FD_1.0-12.1 nls2_0.3-3 mnormt_2.1.0
## [28] farver_2.1.1 coda_0.19-4 parallelly_1.32.1
## [31] vctrs_0.5.0 generics_0.1.3 clusterGeneration_1.3.7
## [34] ipred_0.9-13 xfun_0.31 itertools_0.1-3
## [37] fastcluster_1.2.3 R6_2.5.1 doParallel_1.0.17
## [40] ggbeeswarm_0.6.0 pdist_1.2.1 assertthat_0.2.1
## [43] scales_1.2.0 nnet_7.3-17 beeswarm_0.4.0
## [46] rgeos_0.5-9 gtable_0.3.0 globals_0.16.1
## [49] caper_1.0.1 phangorn_2.9.0 MatrixModels_0.5-1
## [52] timeDate_4021.106 rlang_1.0.6 FSA_0.9.3
## [55] scatterplot3d_0.3-41 splines_4.2.1 rstatix_0.7.1
## [58] rgdal_1.5-30 ModelMetrics_1.2.2.2 broom_1.0.1
## [61] checkmate_2.1.0 reshape2_1.4.4 abind_1.4-5
## [64] backports_1.4.1 Hmisc_4.7-1 caret_6.0-93
## [67] tools_4.2.1 lava_1.7.0 psych_2.2.9
## [70] lavaan_0.6-12 ellipsis_0.3.2 raster_3.5-21
## [73] RColorBrewer_1.1-3 proxy_0.4-27 Rcpp_1.0.9
## [76] plyr_1.8.7 base64enc_0.1-3 progress_1.2.2
## [79] purrr_0.3.4 prettyunits_1.1.1 ggpubr_0.4.0
## [82] rpart_4.1.16 deldir_1.0-6 pbapply_1.5-0
## [85] deSolve_1.34 qgraph_1.9.2 cluster_2.1.3
## [88] magrittr_2.0.3 data.table_1.14.2 SparseM_1.81
## [91] mvtnorm_1.1-3 smoothr_0.2.2 hms_1.1.1
## [94] evaluate_0.15 jpeg_0.1-9 mclust_6.0.0
## [97] gridExtra_2.3 compiler_4.2.1 tibble_3.1.8
## [100] maps_3.4.0 KernSmooth_2.23-20 crayon_1.5.1
## [103] hypervolume_3.0.4 htmltools_0.5.3 mgcv_1.8-40
## [106] corpcor_1.6.10 Formula_1.2-4 snow_0.4-4
## [109] tidyr_1.2.0 expm_0.999-6 lubridate_1.8.0
## [112] DBI_1.1.3 magic_1.6-0 subplex_1.8
## [115] MASS_7.3-57 ade4_1.7-19 car_3.1-1
## [118] cli_3.4.1 quadprog_1.5-8 parallel_4.2.1
## [121] gower_1.0.0 igraph_1.3.4 pkgconfig_2.0.3
## [124] numDeriv_2016.8-1.1 foreign_0.8-82 sp_1.5-0
## [127] terra_1.5-21 recipes_1.0.3 foreach_1.5.2
## [130] pbivnorm_0.6.0 predicts_0.1-3 vipor_0.4.5
## [133] hardhat_1.2.0 prodlim_2019.11.13 stringr_1.4.0
## [136] digest_0.6.29 pracma_2.4.2 phytools_1.0-3
## [139] rcdd_1.5 fastmatch_1.1-3 htmlTable_2.4.1
## [142] quantreg_5.94 gtools_3.9.3 geiger_2.0.10
## [145] lifecycle_1.0.3 glasso_1.11 carData_3.0-5
## [148] maptpx_1.9-7 fansi_1.0.3 pillar_1.8.0
## [151] fastmap_1.1.0 plotrix_3.8-2 survival_3.3-1
## [154] glue_1.6.2 fdrtool_1.2.17 png_0.1-7
## [157] iterators_1.0.14 class_7.3-20 stringi_1.7.8
## [160] palmerpenguins_0.1.1 doSNOW_1.0.20 latticeExtra_0.6-30
## [163] dplyr_1.0.9 e1071_1.7-11 future.apply_1.10.0
```
## REFERENCES