Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(resourceHistoryEvents): route for resource history events (DSP-1749) #1882

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Jun 24, 2021

Conversation

@SepidehAlassi
Copy link
Contributor

@SepidehAlassi SepidehAlassi commented Jun 23, 2021

resolves DSP-1749

@SepidehAlassi SepidehAlassi marked this pull request as draft Jun 23, 2021
@SepidehAlassi SepidehAlassi self-assigned this Jun 23, 2021
@SepidehAlassi SepidehAlassi marked this pull request as ready for review Jun 23, 2021
@SepidehAlassi SepidehAlassi requested a review from subotic Jun 23, 2021
@SepidehAlassi SepidehAlassi changed the title feat(resourceHistoryEvents): rout for resource history events (DSP-1749) feat(resourceHistoryEvents): route for resource history events (DSP-1749) Jun 23, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@subotic subotic left a comment

LGTM, thanks!

@SepidehAlassi SepidehAlassi merged commit f86de53 into main Jun 24, 2021
11 checks passed
11 checks passed
@github-actions
Build Everything
Details
@github-actions
Prepare next release
Details
@github-actions
Test client-test-data
Details
@github-actions
API Unit Tests
Details
@github-actions
API E2E Tests
Details
@github-actions
API Integration Tests
Details
@github-actions
Upgrade Integration Tests
Details
@github-actions
Docs Build Test
Details
@github-actions
Publish (on release only)
Details
@github-actions
Deploy docs (on release only)
Details
@github-actions
Google chat notification about release and published version
Details
@SepidehAlassi SepidehAlassi deleted the wip/DSP-1749_ResourceHistoryEventsRoute branch Jun 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants