Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Decrease timeout for emptying repository (DEV-1518) #2310



Copy link

@mpro7 mpro7 commented Nov 29, 2022

Issue Number: DEV-1518

Pull Request Checklist

Basic Requirements

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix: represents bug fixes
  • Refactor: represents production code refactoring
  • Feature: represents a new feature
  • Documentation: documentation changes (no production code change)
  • Chore: maintenance tasks (no production code change)
  • Style: styles updates (no production code change)
  • Test: all about tests: adding, refactoring tests (no production code change)
  • Other... Please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Does this PR change client-test-data?

  • Yes (don't forget to update the JS-LIB team about the change)
  • No

Other information

@mpro7 mpro7 self-assigned this Nov 29, 2022
Copy link

swarmia bot commented Nov 29, 2022

✅  Linked to Story DEV-1518 · DSP-API: Decrease Timeout for Emptying Repository
➡️  Part of Epic DEV-542 · C: DSP-API Issues

@mpro7 mpro7 changed the title chore: Decrease timeout for emptying repository chore: Decrease timeout for emptying repository (DEV-1518) Nov 29, 2022
@mpro7 mpro7 merged commit a83000b into main Nov 29, 2022
6 checks passed
@mpro7 mpro7 deleted the DEV-1518-dsp-api-decrease-timeout-for-emptying-repository branch November 29, 2022 14:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
None yet

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants