Increase numberOfTestsPerMethod to 100 for testDeterministicAndNonDeterministicProvidersReturnValues

[snuyanzin]

It looks like 10 is not enough for some cases e.g. https://github.com/datafaker-net/datafaker/actions/runs/4554807351/jobs/8033243612

Also there is no need to continue invocations in case set's size is >= 2

[what-the-diff]

PR Summary

• Increase in test iterations
  The number of tests performed for each method is increased from 10 to 100.
• Introduction of new variable and loop condition
  A new variable, currentSize, is introduced and used in the loop condition to ensure at least 100 iterations are executed, but stopping when there are more than one unique values generated by a provider. This helps in identifying non-deterministic behavior.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #745 (470381d) into main (f4699de) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #745      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     92.84%   92.85%   +0.01%     
+ Complexity     2592     2591       -1     
============================================
  Files           281      281              
  Lines          5126     5126              
  Branches        530      530              
============================================
+ Hits           4759     4760       +1     
+ Misses          240      238       -2     
- Partials        127      128       +1     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[kingthorin]

Logically this should be fine, but technically we could end-up with situations where low choice sets (sex, boolean, etc) do generate the same value 100 times. (Improbable but not impossible.) In such cases the failing GitHub action/workflow could just be re-run from the WebUI.

[snuyanzin]

yes, should be very rare case.
Locally I ran this test 1000 times in a row and no failures