Add Java Record support in JavaObjectTransformer #824
Conversation
panilya
force-pushed
the
support-record-java-object-trans
branch
from
ced7c51 to
3492a6e
Compare
| } | ||
|
|
||
| try { | ||
| result = clazz.getDeclaredConstructor(componentTypes).newInstance(values); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it's better to cache it as well to avoid constant calculation logic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think it's possible to cache object, but I can cache constructor. WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, constructor should be enough
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@snuyanzin I have a question for you, imagine an article about Datafaker 2.0, what would you expect to see in that article, I mean topics or something like this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
depends on the target audience...
there is a list of topics missed in faker related talks
- custom providers
- there are ways to generate sequences (stream and sequence)
- the transformation approach (csv, json, sql, java, custom)
- object population as a replacement for builders
- now datafaker is fast enough to generate big test data
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could I send you my draft of the article about Datafaker 2.0? I would like to hear your opinion if you don't mind and if you have time, of course
|
Nice feature Illia, amazing work! |
At the moment, Datafaker doesn't support Java Records. This PR addresses this problem