New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make use of SurrogateColumnType.getFieldNumber() instead of RDBMS-specific variant #194

Closed
andyjefferson opened this Issue May 23, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@andyjefferson
Member

andyjefferson commented May 23, 2017

SurrogateColumnType generalises all possible surrogate columns that we support, and now provides an associated field number. This means that we can remove code from StatementClassMapping and use SurrogateColumnType instead.

@andyjefferson andyjefferson added this to the 5.1.0.m3 milestone May 23, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment