You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Interpreted languages are mostly based on C function strftime() (so they are % based) since the interpreters are written in C. I guess strftime() predates the Unicode standard by several decades, that's why.
The tokens accepted by date-fns are different with what most languages and libraries support.
I focus here on YYYY and DD.
Comparable:
They all follow the specifications from the Unicode Consortium CLDR: http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-31/tr35-dates.html#Date_Format_Patterns
Not comparable:
Interpreted languages are mostly based on C function
strftime()
(so they are % based) since the interpreters are written in C. I guessstrftime()
predates the Unicode standard by several decades, that's why.Edit: somewhat related to #351
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: