Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 'WinFuture.de' (community contribution) #1265

Conversation

datenanfragen-community-edits
Copy link
Collaborator

This suggestion was submitted through the website.

Edit

@WebworkrNet
Copy link
Contributor

I have opened this issue via datenanfragen.de.
You can contact me if you have any questions.

@mal-tee mal-tee assigned mal-tee and unassigned mal-tee Sep 16, 2021
@baltpeter baltpeter self-assigned this Sep 27, 2021
Copy link
Member

@baltpeter baltpeter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@baltpeter baltpeter merged commit d630c19 into datenanfragen:master Sep 27, 2021
@baltpeter baltpeter deleted the suggest_winfuture_1631348789748 branch September 27, 2021 17:55
@WebworkrNet
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Why was this entry assigned to the category "Advertising"? Shouldn't only the primary business purpose be stated?
  2. Why was the name "Sebastian Kuhbach" removed from the record? According to my assessment, he is the website operator according to the imprint. Another stomach ache regarding the personal data?

@baltpeter
Copy link
Member

1. Why was this entry assigned to the category "Advertising"? Shouldn't only the primary business purpose be stated?

See the description in the schema:

"description": "A list of categories that the company fits into. These are purposefully fairly vague and may be applied generously.",

We often don't have a category that perfectly fits a record, so we tend to interpret the existing ones pretty widely. But I don't know this website well, if you think "ads" isn't fitting, we can remove it.

2. Why was the name "Sebastian Kuhbach" removed from the record? According to my assessment, he is the website operator according to the imprint. Another stomach ache regarding the personal data?

Yeah, we try to only process personal data in our company database where absolutely necessary (see #1287). In this case, I am confident enough that correspondence will also arrive just fine without the operator's personal name.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
record Issue related to the JSON records via-suggest-api
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants