New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update 'Westdeutscher Rundfunk Köln' (community contribution) #1508
Update 'Westdeutscher Rundfunk Köln' (community contribution) #1508
Conversation
e3d6f93
to
045f44b
Compare
This dataset can be marked as "
|
|
By "Reference", do you mean something like an "Aktenzeichen" or is that referring to your comment below that? In the latter case, I'd opt to not include that in the record as I don't see a clean way of doing that and I don't think it's a problem if they just ask anyway. |
|
Ping @WebworkrNet. |
|
Oh, I'm sorry that the answer hasn't come back yet. :-( I think I meant it like this: reference means the closer circumstances, such as department, employee or a file number.
The reference is not quite clear to me. What do you mean exactly? |
|
Thanks! In that case, I'd say it doesn't make too much sense to list this under "required elements". If we have a list of applicable services (like sportschau.de), we can list them under "runs". With the new version of the generator, these are listed as checkboxes that the user can choose from: But otherwise, I think we can also leave that as is and the user can then reply after WDR asks them, like in your case. |
You could shorten this quotation and put it in a commentary in relation to the reference. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!

This suggestion was submitted through the website.
Edit