New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update 'Gothaer Versicherungsbank VVaG' (community contribution) #1995
Update 'Gothaer Versicherungsbank VVaG' (community contribution) #1995
Conversation
9177a58
to
d328679
Compare
|
I have opened this issue via datenanfragen.de. |
This dataset can be marked as "
|
|
Provider replied by registered mail via traditional mail. |
|
Regarding a query about the progress of my inquiry, someone from Gothaer Finanzholding AG answered me. Should this entry be re-listed under this company name and "Gothaer Versicherungsbank VVaG" be better listed as "also operates" instead? |
|
New postal address:
|
I withdraw my proposal. The privacy statement mentions "Gothaer Versicherungsbank VVaG". https://www.gothaer.de/rechtliche-informationen/datenschutz/ Instead, list "Gothaer Finanzholding AG" under "also operates"? |
|
Contact form (securely encrypted): https://www.gothaer.de/rechtliche-informationen/datenschutz/kontakt-datenschutzbeauftragter.htm |
We would need a (public, preferably official) source for that. I didn't find "Gothaer Finanzholding AG" in any of the privacy policies listed here, unfortunately. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
I could contact Gothaer again and point this out to them. Should I? In my experience, data protection declarations and the like are not always carefully and regularly maintained. Changes are often only incorporated into these documents after a delay or not at all. |
Sure, if you want to do that. Otherwise, it seems like the request also went fine with the current details, so it doesn't seem to matter too much. shrug
That's definitely my experience as well. I recently had quite a lot of "fun" trying to find the correct details for the Rundfunkdatenschutzbeauftragter because there were many different (and outdated) versions of privacy policies (#2100). :D |
This suggestion was submitted through the website.
Edit in company JSON generator