Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 'Gothaer Versicherungsbank VVaG' (community contribution) #1995

Conversation

datenanfragen-community-edits
Copy link
Collaborator

This suggestion was submitted through the website.

Edit in company JSON generator

@WebworkrNet
Copy link
Contributor

I have opened this issue via datenanfragen.de.
You can contact me if you have any questions.

@WebworkrNet
Copy link
Contributor

This dataset can be marked as "tested".

Personal data provided at data request:

  • Email address
  • Name
  • Address
  • Birth date
  • Other

Evidence requested to confirm identity:

  • No provision of evidence
  • Requests by email must be made from the same email address that is the subject of the request. This should be noted if the submitted address is an email forwarding address.
  • Birth date
  • Copy of ID

@WebworkrNet
Copy link
Contributor

Provider replied by registered mail via traditional mail.

@WebworkrNet
Copy link
Contributor

Regarding a query about the progress of my inquiry, someone from Gothaer Finanzholding AG answered me. Should this entry be re-listed under this company name and "Gothaer Versicherungsbank VVaG" be better listed as "also operates" instead?

@WebworkrNet
Copy link
Contributor

New postal address:

Arnoldiplatz 1
50969 Köln

@WebworkrNet
Copy link
Contributor

Regarding a query about the progress of my inquiry, someone from Gothaer Finanzholding AG answered me. Should this entry be re-listed under this company name and "Gothaer Versicherungsbank VVaG" be better listed as "also operates" instead?

I withdraw my proposal.

The privacy statement mentions "Gothaer Versicherungsbank VVaG".

https://www.gothaer.de/rechtliche-informationen/datenschutz/

Instead, list "Gothaer Finanzholding AG" under "also operates"?

@WebworkrNet
Copy link
Contributor

@baltpeter baltpeter self-assigned this Feb 24, 2023
@baltpeter
Copy link
Member

Instead, list "Gothaer Finanzholding AG" under "also operates"?

We would need a (public, preferably official) source for that. I didn't find "Gothaer Finanzholding AG" in any of the privacy policies listed here, unfortunately.

Copy link
Member

@baltpeter baltpeter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@baltpeter baltpeter merged commit da62d6f into datenanfragen:master Feb 24, 2023
2 checks passed
@baltpeter baltpeter deleted the suggest_gothaer_1671363814894 branch February 24, 2023 14:27
@WebworkrNet
Copy link
Contributor

Instead, list "Gothaer Finanzholding AG" under "also operates"?

We would need a (public, preferably official) source for that. I didn't find "Gothaer Finanzholding AG" in any of the privacy policies listed here, unfortunately.

I could contact Gothaer again and point this out to them. Should I?

In my experience, data protection declarations and the like are not always carefully and regularly maintained. Changes are often only incorporated into these documents after a delay or not at all.

@baltpeter
Copy link
Member

I could contact Gothaer again and point this out to them. Should I?

Sure, if you want to do that. Otherwise, it seems like the request also went fine with the current details, so it doesn't seem to matter too much. shrug

In my experience, data protection declarations and the like are not always carefully and regularly maintained. Changes are often only incorporated into these documents after a delay or not at all.

That's definitely my experience as well. I recently had quite a lot of "fun" trying to find the correct details for the Rundfunkdatenschutzbeauftragter because there were many different (and outdated) versions of privacy policies (#2100). :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
record Issue related to the JSON records via-suggest-api
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants