Closed
Description
Currently the WrightMap uses a sequential list for item.labels (01.1 , 02.1 , 03.1 , ...).
These labels have no bearing on the actual name of the item. Additionally this can get pretty confusing if an item has already been removed.
Could the itemClassic function be amended to allow a user to use their own item names? something like "item.names.labels=TRUE/FALSE "
Thanks
Before:
In example below, item 2 was removed leaving 44 items. The first chart (original WrightMap code) displays "02.1" as an item (its actually item 3).
After:
Using the item names means that we have no confusion about item 2 / item 3.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels