Skip to content

Using item names as item.labels #6

Closed
@LCisannoyed

Description

@LCisannoyed

Currently the WrightMap uses a sequential list for item.labels (01.1 , 02.1 , 03.1 , ...).

These labels have no bearing on the actual name of the item. Additionally this can get pretty confusing if an item has already been removed.

Could the itemClassic function be amended to allow a user to use their own item names? something like "item.names.labels=TRUE/FALSE "

Thanks

Before:
In example below, item 2 was removed leaving 44 items. The first chart (original WrightMap code) displays "02.1" as an item (its actually item 3).
image

After:
Using the item names means that we have no confusion about item 2 / item 3.
image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions