Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using item names as item.labels #6

Closed
LCisannoyed opened this issue Mar 22, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Using item names as item.labels #6

LCisannoyed opened this issue Mar 22, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@LCisannoyed
Copy link

Currently the WrightMap uses a sequential list for item.labels (01.1 , 02.1 , 03.1 , ...).

These labels have no bearing on the actual name of the item. Additionally this can get pretty confusing if an item has already been removed.

Could the itemClassic function be amended to allow a user to use their own item names? something like "item.names.labels=TRUE/FALSE "

Thanks

Before:
In example below, item 2 was removed leaving 44 items. The first chart (original WrightMap code) displays "02.1" as an item (its actually item 3).
image

After:
Using the item names means that we have no confusion about item 2 / item 3.
image

@rfreund
Copy link
Collaborator

rfreund commented Mar 22, 2018 via email

@LCisannoyed
Copy link
Author

Awesome! thanks for this

@rmaxbaer
Copy link

rmaxbaer commented Apr 2, 2020

@rfreund This is great! However, I seem to be losing the functionality in itemClassic to set show.axis.logits = "L" and have the logits axis on the left. Do you know why this might be happening?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants