Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

License #9

Closed
XavCC opened this issue Feb 2, 2019 · 6 comments
Closed

License #9

XavCC opened this issue Feb 2, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@XavCC
Copy link

@XavCC XavCC commented Feb 2, 2019

It would be great with FLOSS license.
What do you think about that ?

@davidtavarez

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Owner

@davidtavarez davidtavarez commented Feb 2, 2019

Which one do you recommend and why?

@XavCC

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@XavCC XavCC commented Feb 2, 2019

Well,
I recommend nothing ;-)
So as far as I hope AGPL seems to fit smart, cause :

But I'm probably a free troll 😉 ?

More seriously, You use MIT license on our blog, so MIT License will be cool too.

@davidtavarez

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Owner

@davidtavarez davidtavarez commented Feb 2, 2019

Interesting... I guess I'm going to choose MIT. Thanks!

@davidtavarez

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Owner

@davidtavarez davidtavarez commented Feb 2, 2019

@XavCC

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

@XavCC XavCC commented Feb 2, 2019

With a LICENSE.txt or LICENSE.md onto the repositiry with your name ? It will be fine 😉

@davidtavarez

This comment has been minimized.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.